Last week, The Intercept published a set of leaks that drew broad interest in perhaps the most undercovered scandal inside the US government today: the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) quiet move to establish, for the first time in US history, an explicitly inward-facing domestic censorship bureau.
What The Intercept glimpsed, however, is just the tip of a much larger iceberg.
The size, scale and speed of DHS's censorship operation are vastly larger have been reported. Based on our investigation, below are seven bottom-line figures summarizing the scope of censorship carried out by DHS speech control partners , as compiled from their own reports and videos:
22 Million tweets labeled “misinformation” on Twitter;
859 Million tweets collected in databases for “misinformation” analysis;
120 analysts monitoring social media “misinformation” in up to 20-hour shifts;
15 tech platforms monitored for “misinformation” often in real-time;
<1 hour average response time between government partners and tech platforms;
Dozens of “misinformation narratives” targeted for platform-wide throttling; and
Hundreds of millions of individual Facebook posts, YouTube videos, TikToks, and tweets impacted, due to “misinformation” Terms of Service policy changes that DHS partners openly plotted and bragged tech companies would never have done without DHS partner insistence and “huge regulatory pressure” from government.
The citations above are from just the DHS censorship network’s impact on the 2020 election cycle alone. That was two years ago, when the narrative management machine referenced by The Intercept was first getting formed. Even the above figures, however, just scratch the surface of the full story.
While The Intercept rightly noted that DHS's “truth cops“ now take on a range of other topics – such as Covid-19 and geopolitical opinions – it all started from, and grew out of, DHS's speech control infrastructure set up to censor speech about elections.
That started with the 2020 election. But it continues, importantly, with the 2022 midterm elections, which are ongoing this week.
At Foundation for Freedom Online, for more than six months, we have been publishing and sharing research findings about a wide span of shocking components to DHS's speech control operations. Our investigation has spurred multiple members of Congress to vow aggressive probes into DHS's “ government censorship by proxy .”
The whole story, however, has not all been published in one place. In this report, we seek to provide a comprehensive history and network map of DHS's public-private censorship network, as told through a deep dive into its first mission — the censorship of the 2020 election.
Along the way, we will highlight the network's role in censoring the ongoing 2022 midterm elections.
In the final section of this report, we will cover a particularly disturbing aspect of this story — DHS's pre-censorship of speech that could “cast doubt” on a so-called “ red mirage, blue shift ” election scenario, months in advance of such an exact sequence playing out.
.
The Twitter Files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself. The public deserves to know what really happened …
9:09 PM · Nov 28, 2022
132K Reposts · 853K Likes
This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead.
1:41 AM · Nov 29, 2022
146K Reposts · 922K Likes
We’re double-checking some facts, so probably start live tweeting in about 40 mins
10:21 PM · Dec 2, 2022
27K Reposts · 275K Likes
What really happened with the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter will be published on Twitter at 5pm ET!
8:39 PM · Dec 2, 2022
107K Reposts · 726K Likes
1. Thread: THE TWITTER FILES
11:34 PM · Dec 2, 2022
132K Reposts · 380K Likes
2. What you’re about to read is the first installment in a series, based upon thousands of internal documents obtained by sources at Twitter.
11:39 PM · Dec 2, 2022
15.5K Reposts · 109K Likes
3. The “Twitter Files” tell an incredible story from inside one of the world’s largest and most influential social media platforms. It is a Frankensteinian tale of a human-built mechanism grown out the control of its designer.
11:41 PM · Dec 2, 2022
14.4K Reposts · 103K Likes
4. Twitter in its conception was a brilliant tool for enabling instant mass communication, making a true real-time global conversation possible for the first time.
11:43 PM · Dec 2, 2022
11.2K Reposts · 89.2K Likes
5. In an early conception, Twitter more than lived up to its mission statement, giving people “the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.”
11:45 PM · Dec 2, 2022
10.7K Reposts · 84.2K Likes
6. As time progressed, however, the company was slowly forced to add those barriers. Some of the first tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and financial fraudsters.
11:46 PM · Dec 2, 2022
11.2K Reposts · 86.4K Likes
7. Slowly, over time, Twitter staff and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. Outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate speech as well: first a little, then more often, then constantly.
11:47 PM · Dec 2, 2022
15K Reposts · 99.1K Likes
8. By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to another: “More to review from the Biden team.” The reply would come back: “Handled.”
11:52 PM · Dec 2, 2022
39.3K Reposts · 154K Likes
9. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party:
11:56 PM · Dec 2, 2022
22.6K Reposts · 112K Likes
10.Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However:
11:58 PM · Dec 2, 2022
13K Reposts · 85.4K Likes
11. This system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right.
12:02 AM · Dec 3, 2022
24.5K Reposts · 116K Likes
12. The resulting slant in content moderation decisions is visible in the documents you’re about to read. However, it’s also the assessment of multiple current and former high-level executives.
12:04 AM · Dec 3, 2022
12.3K Reposts · 85.9K Likes
Okay, there was more throat-clearing about the process, but screw it, let's jump forward
12:05 AM · Dec 3, 2022
8.35K Reposts · 73.5K Likes
16. The Twitter Files, Part One: How and Why Twitter Blocked the Hunter Biden Laptop Story
12:06 AM · Dec 3, 2022
17.6K Reposts · 91.2K Likes
17. On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published BIDEN SECRET EMAILS, an expose based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop:
nypost.com
Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
12:07 AM · Dec 3, 2022
24.7K Reposts · 103K Likes
18. Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. child pornography.
12:08 AM · Dec 3, 2022
23.9K Reposts · 115K Likes
19. White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who seethed: “At least pretend to care for the next 20 days.”
12:09 AM · Dec 3, 2022
22.7K Reposts · 116K Likes
20.This led public policy executive Caroline Strom to send out a polite WTF query. Several employees noted that there was tension between the comms/policy teams, who had little/less control over moderation, and the safety/trust teams:
12:12 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11.7K Reposts · 73.4K Likes
21. Strom’s note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s “hacked materials” policy: https://t.co/EdTa2xbXn1
12:13 AM · Dec 3, 2022
12.6K Reposts · 73.5K Likes
22. Although several sources recalled hearing about a “general” warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence - that I've seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story. In fact, that might have been the problem...
12:18 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11.4K Reposts · 75.2K Likes
23. The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde playing a key role.
12:19 AM · Dec 3, 2022
16.6K Reposts · 90.3K Likes
24. “They just freelanced it,” is how one former employee characterized the decision. “Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn’t going to hold. But no one had the guts to reverse it.”
12:19 AM · Dec 3, 2022
14.1K Reposts · 83.4K Likes
can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchange, which ends up including Gadde and former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth. Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, “I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe”:
12:21 AM · Dec 3, 2022
14.7K Reposts · 79.3K Likes
26. By this point “everyone knew this was fucked,” said one former employee, but the response was essentially to err on the side of… continuing to err.
12:24 AM · Dec 3, 2022
14.3K Reposts · 77K Likes
27. Former VP of Global Comms Brandon Borrman asks, “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?”
12:26 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11.3K Reposts · 69.3K Likes
28. To which former Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker again seems to advise staying the non-course, because “caution is warranted”:
12:28 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11.1K Reposts · 65.8K Likes
29. A fundamental problem with tech companies and content moderation: many people in charge of speech know/care little about speech, and have to be told the basics by outsiders. To wit:
12:30 AM · Dec 3, 2022
10.9K Reposts · 72.5K Likes
30. In one humorous exchange on day 1, Democratic congressman Ro Khanna reaches out to Gadde to gently suggest she hop on the phone to talk about the “backlash re speech.” Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern.
12:31 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11.2K Reposts · 67.9K Likes
Gadde replies quickly, immediately diving into the weeds of Twitter policy, unaware Khanna is more worried about the Bill of Rights:
12:32 AM · Dec 3, 2022
10.9K Reposts · 64.5K Likes
32.Khanna tries to reroute the conversation to the First Amendment, mention of which is generally hard to find in the files:
12:34 AM · Dec 3, 2022
13.9K Reposts · 76.8K Likes
33.Within a day, head of Public Policy Lauren Culbertson receives a ghastly letter/report from Carl Szabo of the research firm NetChoice, which had already polled 12 members of congress – 9 Rs and 3 Democrats, from “the House Judiciary Committee to Rep. Judy Chu’s office.”
12:38 AM · Dec 3, 2022
10.3K Reposts · 61.9K Likes
34.NetChoice lets Twitter know a “blood bath” awaits in upcoming Hill hearings, with members saying it's a "tipping point," complaining tech has “grown so big that they can’t even regulate themselves, so government may need to intervene.”
12:42 AM · Dec 3, 2022
8.88K Reposts · 50.3K Likes
35.Szabo reports to Twitter that some Hill figures are characterizing the laptop story as “tech’s Access Hollywood moment”:
12:43 AM · Dec 3, 2022
8.58K Reposts · 50K Likes
36.Twitter files continued:
"THE FIRST AMENDMENT ISN’T ABSOLUTE”
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it's "not absolute"
12:45 AM · Dec 3, 2022
22.2K Reposts · 78.9K Likes
An amazing subplot of the Twitter/Hunter Biden laptop affair was how much was done without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, and how long it took for the situation to get "unfucked" (as one ex-employee put it) even after Dorsey jumped in.
12:55 AM · Dec 3, 2022
13K Reposts · 76.5K Likes
There are multiple instances in the files of Dorsey intervening to question suspensions and other moderation actions, for accounts across the political spectrum
1:10 AM · Dec 3, 2022
7.08K Reposts · 47.5K Likes
The problem with the "hacked materials" ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a "whirlwind" 24-hour, company-wide mess.
1:30 AM · Dec 3, 2022
8.45K Reposts · 43.5K Likes
It's been a whirlwind 96 hours for me, too. There is much more to come, including answers to questions about issues like shadow-banning, boosting, follower counts, the fate of various individual accounts, and more. These issues are not limited to the political right.
1:35 AM · Dec 3, 2022
12.8K Reposts · 86.9K Likes
Good night, everyone. Thanks to all those who picked up the phone in the last few days.
1:37 AM · Dec 3, 2022
4.72K Reposts · 81.3K Likes
Looking forward to going through all the tweets complaining about “PR for the richest man on earth,” and seeing how many of them have run stories for anonymous sources at the FBI, CIA, the Pentagon, White House, etc.
12:12 AM · Dec 4, 2022
21.6K Reposts · 116K Likes
Six Degrees from James Baker: A Familiar Figure Reemerges With the Release of the Twitter Files – JONATHAN TURLEY
jonathanturley.org
Six Degrees from James Baker: A Familiar Figure Reemerges With the Release of the Twitter Files
3:50 PM · Dec 4, 2022
13.5K Reposts · 52.2K Likes
Old friend Matt Bivens with thoughts on Yoel Roth, the FBI, and the Twitter Files
open.substack.com
Twitter is Fun Again!
2:22 AM · Dec 5, 2022
2.24K Reposts · 11.3K Likes
THREAD: Twitter Files Supplemental
9:38 PM · Dec 6, 2022
24.3K Reposts · 89.6K Likes
On Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here. We expected to publish more over the weekend. Many wondered why there was a delay.
9:39 PM · Dec 6, 2022
4.62K Reposts · 31K Likes
We can now tell you part of the reason why. On Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel (and former FBI General Counsel) Jim Baker was fired. Among the reasons? Vetting the first batch of “Twitter Files” – without knowledge of new management.
9:40 PM · Dec 6, 2022
12.2K Reposts · 53.7K Likes
The process for producing the “Twitter Files” involved delivery to two journalists (Bari Weiss and me) via a lawyer close to new management. However, after the initial batch, things became complicated.
9:42 PM · Dec 6, 2022
4.82K Reposts · 33.5K Likes
Over the weekend, while we both dealt with obstacles to new searches, it was who discovered that the person in charge of releasing the files was someone named Jim. When she called to ask “Jim’s” last name, the answer came back: “Jim Baker.”
9:44 PM · Dec 6, 2022
7.45K Reposts · 40.4K Likes
“My jaw hit the floor,” says Weiss.
9:44 PM · Dec 6, 2022
4.38K Reposts · 35.4K Likes
The first batch of files both reporters received was marked, “Spectra Baker Emails.”
9:45 PM · Dec 6, 2022
4.71K Reposts · 31.1K Likes
Baker is a controversial figure. He has been something of a Zelig of FBI controversies dating back to 2016, from the Steele Dossier to the Alfa-Server mess. He resigned in 2018 after an investigation into leaks to the press.
9:47 PM · Dec 6, 2022
6.64K Reposts · 39.4K Likes
The news that Baker was reviewing the “Twitter files” surprised everyone involved, to say the least. New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to “exit” Baker Tuesday.
9:50 PM · Dec 6, 2022
9.58K Reposts · 57.5K Likes
Reporters resumed searches through Twitter Files material – a lot of it – today. The next installment of “The Twitter Files” will appear . Stay tuned.
9:54 PM · Dec 6, 2022
8.74K Reposts · 57.8K Likes
Twitter's former top attorney James Baker was formerly an FBI attorney who passed on fake dirt from the Hillary campaign’s operatives in 2016, alleging a secret online portal from Russia's Alfa Bank to Trump. Now attempted to shape the “Twitter Files.”
@bariweiss The news that Baker was reviewing the “Twitter files” surprised everyone involved, to say the least. New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to “exit” Baker Tuesday.
9:56 PM · Dec 6, 2022
4.2K Reposts · 13.7K Likes
The Hillary campaign, secretly using tech experts, attempted to pass off this fabricated evidence to a number of media outlets. We received the info and published a debunk of the “Alfa Bank” story. Nevertheless, tons of media ran with it.
theintercept.com
Here’s the Problem With the Story Connecting Russia to Donald Trump’s Email Server
9:59 PM · Dec 6, 2022
1.09K Reposts · 4.55K Likes
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART TWO.
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
12:15 AM · Dec 9, 2022
88.3K Reposts · 249K Likes
1. A new investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics—all in secret, without informing users.
12:20 AM · Dec 9, 2022
31.4K Reposts · 123K Likes
2. Twitter once had a mission “to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.” Along the way, barriers nevertheless were erected.
12:24 AM · Dec 9, 2022
12.9K Reposts · 81.6K Likes
3. Take, for example, Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya () who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a “Trends Blacklist,” which prevented his tweets from trending.
12:30 AM · Dec 9, 2022
29.6K Reposts · 114K Likes
4. Or consider the popular right-wing talk show host, Dan Bongino (), who at one point was slapped with a “Search Blacklist.”
12:33 AM · Dec 9, 2022
17.9K Reposts · 84.4K Likes
5. Twitter set the account of conservative activist Charlie Kirk () to “Do Not Amplify.”
12:36 AM · Dec 9, 2022
18.2K Reposts · 85K Likes
6. Twitter denied that it does such things. In 2018, Twitter's Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said: “We do not shadow ban.” They added: “And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.”
12:40 AM · Dec 9, 2022
18.8K Reposts · 99.7K Likes
7. What many people call “shadow banning,” Twitter executives and employees call “Visibility Filtering” or “VF.” Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning.
12:41 AM · Dec 9, 2022
15.1K Reposts · 83.5K Likes
8. “Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,” one senior Twitter employee told us.
12:43 AM · Dec 9, 2022
12.8K Reposts · 74.6K Likes
9. “VF” refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the “trending” page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches.
12:47 AM · Dec 9, 2022
12.6K Reposts · 70.1K Likes
10. All without users’ knowledge.
12:47 AM · Dec 9, 2022
10.6K Reposts · 68.8K Likes
11. “We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do,” one Twitter engineer told us. Two additional Twitter employees confirmed.
12:48 AM · Dec 9, 2022
13.8K Reposts · 73.1K Likes
12. The group that decided whether to limit the reach of certain users was the Strategic Response Team - Global Escalation Team, or SRT-GET. It often handled up to 200 "cases" a day.
12:50 AM · Dec 9, 2022
10.9K Reposts · 64.1K Likes
13. But there existed a level beyond official ticketing, beyond the rank-and-file moderators following the company’s policy on paper. That is the “Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support,” known as “SIP-PES.”
12:54 AM · Dec 9, 2022
9.73K Reposts · 58.6K Likes
14. This secret group included Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust (Vijaya Gadde), the Global Head of Trust & Safety (Yoel Roth), subsequent CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal, and others.
12:55 AM · Dec 9, 2022
13K Reposts · 67.5K Likes
15. This is where the biggest, most politically sensitive decisions got made. “Think high follower account, controversial,” another Twitter employee told us. For these “there would be no ticket or anything.”
12:57 AM · Dec 9, 2022
10.4K Reposts · 61.7K Likes
16. One of the accounts that rose to this level of scrutiny was —an account that was on the “Trends Blacklist” and was designated as “Do Not Take Action on User Without Consulting With SIP-PES.”
1:00 AM · Dec 9, 2022
15.9K Reposts · 75.6K Likes
17. The account—which Chaya Raichik began in November 2020 and now boasts over 1.4 million followers—was subjected to six suspensions in 2022 alone, Raichik says. Each time, Raichik was blocked from posting for as long as a week.
1:03 AM · Dec 9, 2022
9.78K Reposts · 61.3K Likes
18. Twitter repeatedly informed Raichik that she had been suspended for violating Twitter’s policy against “hateful conduct.”
1:04 AM · Dec 9, 2022
8.55K Reposts · 56.3K Likes
The Twitter Files, Part Deux!! 🍿🍿
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART TWO.
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
1:05 AM · Dec 9, 2022
41.4K Reposts · 216K Likes
19. But in an internal SIP-PES memo from October 2022, after her seventh suspension, the committee acknowledged that “LTT has not directly engaged in behavior violative of the Hateful Conduct policy." See here:
1:08 AM · Dec 9, 2022
11.7K Reposts · 63.5K Likes
20. The committee justified her suspensions internally by claiming her posts encouraged online harassment of “hospitals and medical providers” by insinuating “that gender-affirming healthcare is equivalent to child abuse or grooming.”
1:09 AM · Dec 9, 2022
9.6K Reposts · 59.8K Likes
21. Compare this to what happened when Raichik herself was doxxed on November 21, 2022. A photo of her home with her address was posted in a tweet that has garnered more than 10,000 likes.
1:11 AM · Dec 9, 2022
9.85K Reposts · 60K Likes
22. When Raichik told Twitter that her address had been disseminated she says Twitter Support responded with this message: "We reviewed the reported content, and didn't find it to be in violation of the Twitter rules." No action was taken. The doxxing tweet is still up.
1:16 AM · Dec 9, 2022
12.4K Reposts · 64.9K Likes
23. In internal Slack messages, Twitter employees spoke of using technicalities to restrict the visibility of tweets and subjects. Here’s Yoel Roth, Twitter’s then Global Head of Trust & Safety, in a direct message to a colleague in early 2021:
1:18 AM · Dec 9, 2022
8.47K Reposts · 49.9K Likes
24. Six days later, in a direct message with an employee on the Health, Misinformation, Privacy, and Identity research team, Roth requested more research to support expanding “non-removal policy interventions like disabling engagements and deamplification/visibility filtering.”
1:19 AM · Dec 9, 2022
8.5K Reposts · 48.9K Likes
25. Roth wrote: “The hypothesis underlying much of what we’ve implemented is that if exposure to, e.g., misinformation directly causes harm, we should use remediations that reduce exposure, and limiting the spread/virality of content is a good way to do that.”
1:20 AM · Dec 9, 2022
7.33K Reposts · 46.5K Likes
26. He added: “We got Jack on board with implementing this for civic integrity in the near term, but we’re going to need to make a more robust case to get this into our repertoire of policy remediations – especially for other policy domains.”
1:21 AM · Dec 9, 2022
7.89K Reposts · 47.8K Likes
27. There is more to come on this story, which was reported by and the team The Free Press .
Keep up with this unfolding story here and at our brand new website: .
1:27 AM · Dec 9, 2022
9.39K Reposts · 52.2K Likes
28. The authors have broad and expanding access to Twitter’s files. The only condition we agreed to was that the material would first be published on Twitter.
1:28 AM · Dec 9, 2022
7.07K Reposts · 50.9K Likes
29. We're just getting started on our reporting. Documents cannot tell the whole story here. A big thank you to everyone who has spoken to us so far. If you are a current or former Twitter employee, we'd love to hear from you. Please write to: tips@thefp.com
1:38 AM · Dec 9, 2022
8.14K Reposts · 56.4K Likes
30. Watch for the next installment.
1:40 AM · Dec 9, 2022
7.93K Reposts · 58.7K Likes
Truth brings reconciliation
4:24 AM · Dec 9, 2022
39K Reposts · 366K Likes
These are obvious account deletions with no tweets & no log in for years
8:00 AM · Dec 9, 2022
11K Reposts · 185K Likes
Twitter will soon start freeing the name space of 1.5 billion accounts
7:58 AM · Dec 9, 2022
34.5K Reposts · 402K Likes
The Twitter Files, Part 3
Deplatforming the President
1. THREAD: The Twitter Files
THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP
Part One: October 2020-January 6th
1:57 AM · Dec 10, 2022
47.5K Reposts · 210K Likes
1. THREAD: The Twitter Files
THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP
Part One: October 2020-January 6th
11:04 PM · Dec 9, 2022
60.6K Reposts · 175K Likes
2. The world knows much of the story of what happened between riots at the Capitol on January 6th, and the removal of President Donald Trump from Twitter on January 8th...
11:06 PM · Dec 9, 2022
8.69K Reposts · 54.7K Likes
3. We’ll show you what hasn’t been revealed: the erosion of standards within the company in months before J6, decisions by high-ranking executives to violate their own policies, and more, against the backdrop of ongoing, documented interaction with federal agencies.
11:07 PM · Dec 9, 2022
10.4K Reposts · 60K Likes
4. This first installment covers the period before the election through January 6th. Tomorrow, will detail the chaos inside Twitter on January 7th. On Sunday, will reveal the secret internal communications from the key date of January 8th.
11:10 PM · Dec 9, 2022
10.6K Reposts · 56.4K Likes
5. Whatever your opinion on the decision to remove Trump that day, the internal communications at Twitter between January 6th-January 8th have clear historical import. Even Twitter’s employees understood in the moment it was a landmark moment in the annals of speech.
11:14 PM · Dec 9, 2022
9.6K Reposts · 52.2K Likes
6. As soon as they finished banning Trump, Twitter execs started processing new power. They prepared to ban future presidents and White Houses – perhaps even Joe Biden. The “new administration,” says one exec, “will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.”
11:19 PM · Dec 9, 2022
9.92K Reposts · 48.7K Likes
7. Twitter executives removed Trump in part over what one executive called the “context surrounding”: actions by Trump and supporters “over the course of the election and frankly last 4+ years.” In the end, they looked at a broad picture. But that approach can cut both ways.
11:24 PM · Dec 9, 2022
8.7K Reposts · 44.9K Likes
8. The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump’s ban took place in those three January days. However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots.
11:25 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.9K Reposts · 45.9K Likes
9. Before J6, Twitter was a unique mix of automated, rules-based enforcement, and more subjective moderation by senior executives. As reported, the firm had a vast array of tools for manipulating visibility, most all of which were thrown at Trump (and others) pre-J6.
11:29 PM · Dec 9, 2022
8.09K Reposts · 44K Likes
10. As the election approached, senior executives – perhaps under pressure from federal agencies, with whom they met more as time progressed – increasingly struggled with rules, and began to speak of “vios” as pretexts to do what they’d likely have done anyway.
11:31 PM · Dec 9, 2022
9.15K Reposts · 50.6K Likes
11. After J6, internal Slacks show Twitter executives getting a kick out of intensified relationships with federal agencies. Here’s Trust and Safety head Yoel Roth, lamenting a lack of “generic enough” calendar descriptions to concealing his “very interesting” meeting partners.
11:35 PM · Dec 9, 2022
11.6K Reposts · 49.6K Likes
12. These initial reports are based on searches for docs linked to prominent executives, whose names are already public. They include Roth, former trust and policy chief Vijaya Gadde, and recently plank-walked Deputy General Counsel (and former top FBI lawyer) Jim Baker.
11:37 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.04K Reposts · 40.9K Likes
13. One particular slack channel offers an unique window into the evolving thinking of top officials in late 2020 and early 2021.
11:38 PM · Dec 9, 2022
5.53K Reposts · 35K Likes
14. On October 8th, 2020, executives opened a channel called “us2020_xfn_enforcement.” Through J6, this would be home for discussions about election-related removals, especially ones that involved “high-profile” accounts (often called “VITs” or “Very Important Tweeters”).
11:40 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.45K Reposts · 37K Likes
14. On October 8th, 2020, executives opened a channel called “us2020_xfn_enforcement.” Through J6, this would be home for discussions about election-related removals, especially ones that involved “high-profile” accounts (often called “VITs” or “Very Important Tweeters”).
11:40 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.45K Reposts · 37K Likes
15. There was at least some tension between Safety Operations – a larger department whose staffers used a more rules-based process for addressing issues like porn, scams, and threats – and a smaller, more powerful cadre of senior policy execs like Roth and Gadde.
11:41 PM · Dec 9, 2022
6.04K Reposts · 36K Likes
16. The latter group were a high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the President.
11:46 PM · Dec 9, 2022
10.6K Reposts · 46.6K Likes
17. During this time, executives were also clearly liaising with federal enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of election-related content. While we’re still at the start of reviewing the , we’re finding out more about these interactions every day.
11:47 PM · Dec 9, 2022
8.25K Reposts · 42.6K Likes
18. Policy Director Nick Pickles is asked if they should say Twitter detects “misinfo” through “ML, human review, and **partnerships with outside experts?*” The employee asks, “I know that’s been a slippery process… not sure if you want our public explanation to hang on that.”
11:51 PM · Dec 9, 2022
6.95K Reposts · 35.7K Likes
19. Pickles quickly asks if they could “just say “partnerships.” After a pause, he says, “e.g. not sure we’d describe the FBI/DHS as experts.”
11:52 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.88K Reposts · 38K Likes
20. This post about the Hunter Biden laptop situation shows that Roth not only met weekly with the FBI and DHS, but with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI):
11:54 PM · Dec 9, 2022
13.6K Reposts · 48.4K Likes
21. Roth’s report to FBI/DHS/DNI is almost farcical in its self-flagellating tone:
“We blocked the NYP story, then unblocked it (but said the opposite)… comms is angry, reporters think we’re idiots… in short, FML” (fuck my life).
11:56 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.27K Reposts · 35.8K Likes
21. Roth’s report to FBI/DHS/DNI is almost farcical in its self-flagellating tone:
“We blocked the NYP story, then unblocked it (but said the opposite)… comms is angry, reporters think we’re idiots… in short, FML” (fuck my life).
11:56 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.27K Reposts · 35.8K Likes
23. Some of Roth’s later Slacks indicate his weekly confabs with federal law enforcement involved separate meetings. Here, he ghosts the FBI and DHS, respectively, to go first to an “Aspen Institute thing,” then take a call with Apple.
11:58 PM · Dec 9, 2022
7.4K Reposts · 35.4K Likes
24. Here, the FBI sends reports about a pair of tweets, the second of which involves a former Tippecanoe County, Indiana Councilor and Republican named claiming “Between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors.”
12:00 AM · Dec 10, 2022
7.76K Reposts · 35.4K Likes
The FBI's second report concerned this tweet by :
12:02 AM · Dec 10, 2022
9.07K Reposts · 38.8K Likes
25. The FBI-flagged tweet then got circulated in the enforcement Slack. Twitter cited Politifact to say the first story was “proven to be false,” then noted the second was already deemed “no vio on numerous occasions.”
12:03 AM · Dec 10, 2022
6.31K Reposts · 32.6K Likes
26. The group then decides to apply a “Learn how voting is safe and secure” label because one commenter says, “it’s totally normal to have a 2% error rate.” Roth then gives the final go-ahead to the process initiated by the FBI:
12:04 AM · Dec 10, 2022
6.6K Reposts · 33.3K Likes
The FBI's second report concerned this tweet by :
12:02 AM · Dec 10, 2022
9.06K Reposts · 38.8K Likes
27. Examining the entire election enforcement Slack, we didn’t see one reference to moderation requests from the Trump campaign, the Trump White House, or Republicans generally. We looked. They may exist: we were told they do. However, they were absent here.
12:05 AM · Dec 10, 2022
11.3K Reposts · 50.3K Likes
31. In one case, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee joke-tweets about mailing in ballots for his “deceased parents and grandparents.”
2:07 AM · Dec 10, 2022
1.34K Reposts · 7.83K Likes
32. This inspires a long Slack that reads like an parody. “I agree it’s a joke,” concedes a Twitter employee, “but he’s also literally admitting in a tweet a crime.”
12:08 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.75K Reposts · 20K Likes
The group declares Huck’s an “edge case,” and though one notes, “we don’t make exceptions for jokes or satire,” they ultimately decide to leave him be, because “we’ve poked enough bears.”
12:09 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.57K Reposts · 19.2K Likes
33. "Could still mislead people... could still mislead people," the humor-averse group declares, before moving on from Huckabee
12:11 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.88K Reposts · 18.9K Likes
33. Roth suggests moderation even in this absurd case could depend on whether or not the joke results in “confusion.” This seemingly silly case actually foreshadows serious later issues:
12:14 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.45K Reposts · 17K Likes
34. In the docs, execs often expand criteria to subjective issues like intent (yes, a video is authentic, but why was it shown?), orientation (was a banned tweet shown to condemn, or support?), or reception (did a joke cause “confusion”?). This reflex will become key in J6.
12:16 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.83K Reposts · 18.4K Likes
35. In another example, Twitter employees prepare to slap a “mail-in voting is safe” warning label on a Trump tweet about a postal screwup in Ohio, before realizing “the events took place,” which meant the tweet was “factually accurate”:
12:18 AM · Dec 10, 2022
5.51K Reposts · 21.2K Likes
36. “VERY WELL DONE ON SPEED” Trump was being “visibility filtered” as late as a week before the election. Here, senior execs didn’t appear to have a particular violation, but still worked fast to make sure a fairly anodyne Trump tweet couldn’t be “replied to, shared, or liked”:
12:20 AM · Dec 10, 2022
6.85K Reposts · 22.3K Likes
"VERY WELL DONE ON SPEED": the group is pleased the Trump tweet is dealt with quickly
12:23 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.99K Reposts · 17.2K Likes
37. A seemingly innocuous follow-up involved a tweet from actor , whose ubiquitous presence in argued-over Twitter data sets is already a in-joke.
12:24 AM · Dec 10, 2022
5.23K Reposts · 21.5K Likes
38. After Woods angrily quote-tweeted about Trump’s warning label, Twitter staff – in a preview of what ended up happening after J6 – despaired of a reason for action, but resolved to “hit him hard on future vio.”
12:27 AM · Dec 10, 2022
5.18K Reposts · 20.4K Likes
39. Here a label is applied to Georgia Republican congresswoman Jody Hice for saying, “Say NO to big tech censorship!” and, “Mailed ballots are more prone to fraud than in-person balloting… It’s just common sense.”
12:28 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.38K Reposts · 19.5K Likes
40. Twitter teams went easy on Hice, only applying “soft intervention,” with Roth worrying about a “wah wah censorship” optics backlash:
12:29 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.76K Reposts · 17.3K Likes
41. Meanwhile, there are multiple instances of involving pro-Biden tweets warning Trump “may try to steal the election” that got surfaced, only to be approved by senior executives. This one, they decide, just “expresses concern that mailed ballots might not make it on time.”
12:32 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.92K Reposts · 19.6K Likes
42. “THAT’S UNDERSTANDABLE”: Even the hashtag – referencing a theory that a combo of Amy Coney Barrett and Trump will steal the election – is approved by Twitter brass, because it’s “understandable” and a “reference to… a US Supreme Court decision.”
12:36 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.5K Reposts · 18.8K Likes
43. In this exchange, again unintentionally humorous, former Attorney General Eric Holder claimed the U.S. Postal Service was “deliberately crippled,”ostensibly by the Trump administration. He was initially hit with a generic warning label, but it was quickly taken off by Roth:
12:39 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.63K Reposts · 19.3K Likes
44. Later in November 2020, Roth asked if staff had a “debunk moment” on the “SCYTL/Smartmantic vote-counting” stories, which his DHS contacts told him were a combination of “about 47” conspiracy theories:
12:41 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.54K Reposts · 16K Likes
45. On December 10th, as Trump was in the middle of firing off 25 tweets saying things like, “A coup is taking place in front of our eyes,” Twitter executives announced a new “L3 deamplification” tool. This step meant a warning label now could also come with deamplification:
12:43 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.19K Reposts · 17K Likes
46. Some executives wanted to use the new deamplification tool to silently limit Trump’s reach more right away, beginning with the following tweet:
12:44 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.28K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
47. However, in the end, the team had to use older, less aggressive labeling tools at least for that day, until the “L3 entities” went live the following morning.
12:46 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.23K Reposts · 15.7K Likes
48. The significance is that it shows that Twitter, in 2020 at least, was deploying a vast range of visible and invisible tools to rein in Trump’s engagement, long before J6. The ban will come after other avenues are exhausted
12:48 AM · Dec 10, 2022
5.65K Reposts · 21.8K Likes
49. In Twitter docs execs frequently refer to “bots,” e.g. “let’s put a bot on that.” A bot is just any automated heuristic moderation rule. It can be anything: every time a person in Brazil uses “green” and “blob” in the same sentence, action might be taken.
12:51 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.58K Reposts · 16.2K Likes
50. In this instance, it appears moderators added a bot for a Trump claim made on Breitbart. The bot ends up becoming an automated tool invisibly watching both Trump and, apparently, Breitbart (“will add media ID to bot”). Trump by J6 was quickly covered in bots.
12:54 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.76K Reposts · 18K Likes
51. There is no way to follow the frenzied exchanges among Twitter personnel from between January 6thand 8th without knowing the basics of the company’s vast lexicon of acronyms and Orwellian unwords.
12:55 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.82K Reposts · 18.5K Likes
52. To “bounce” an account is to put it in timeout, usually for a 12-hour review/cool-off:
12:55 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.47K Reposts · 16.4K Likes
53. “Interstitial,” one of many nouns used as a verb in Twitterspeak (“denylist” is another), means placing a physical label atop a tweet, so it can’t be seen.
12:58 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.27K Reposts · 16K Likes
54. PII has multiple meanings, one being “Public Interest Interstitial,” i.e. a covering label applied for “public interest” reasons. The post below also references “proactive V,” i.e. proactive visibility filtering.
12:59 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.95K Reposts · 14.8K Likes
55. This is all necessary background to J6. Before the riots, the company was engaged in an inherently insane/impossible project, trying to create an ever-expanding, ostensibly rational set of rules to regulate every conceivable speech situation that might arise between humans.
1:00 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.66K Reposts · 20.1K Likes
This project was preposterous yet its leaders were unable to see this, having become infected with groupthing, coming to believe – sincerely – that it was Twitter's responsibility to control, as much as possible, what people could talk about, how often, and with whom.
1:00 AM · Dec 10, 2022
6.35K Reposts · 25.1K Likes
56. When panic first breaks out on J6 there’s a fair share of WTF-type posts, mixed in with frantic calls for Twitter to start deploying its full arsenal of moderation tools. “What is the right remediation? Do we interstitial the video?” asks one employee, in despair:
1:03 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.25K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
57. The firm’s executives on day 1 of the January 6th crisis at least tried to pay lip service to its dizzying array of rules. By day 2, they began wavering. By day 3, a million rules were reduced to one: what we say, goes
1:01 AM · Dec 10, 2022
5.06K Reposts · 21.4K Likes
58. Roth groans about Coudrey: “THIS asshole,” but still seems determined to stick at least superficially to rules, itching to act “if” this “constitutes incitement.”
1:05 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.36K Reposts · 10.7K Likes
59. At 2:39 p.m. PST, a comms official asked Roth to confirm or deny a story that they’d restricted Trump’s ability to tweet. Roth says, “We have not.”
1:07 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.64K Reposts · 11.6K Likes
60. Minutes later, Roth executed the historic act of “bouncing” Trump, i.e. putting him in timeout. “I hope you… are appropriately CorpSec’d,” says a colleague.
1:09 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.01K Reposts · 12.2K Likes
This theme of Policy perhaps being stressed by queries from Communications executives – who themselves have to answer the public’s questions – occasionally appears. Two days later, you see chatter about pulling Comms out of the loop:
1:11 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.32K Reposts · 10.9K Likes
61. The first company-wide email from Gadde on January 6th announced that 3 Trump tweets had been bounced, but more importantly signaled a determination to use legit “violations” as a guide for any possible permanent suspension:
1:13 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.15K Reposts · 13.1K Likes
62. “WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?” Safe to say Trump’s “Go home with love & in peace” tweet mid-riot didn’t go over well at Twitter HQ:
1:15 AM · Dec 10, 2022
6.71K Reposts · 21K Likes
63. A few last notes about January 6th. Roth at one point looked and found Trump had a slew of duplicate bot applications:
1:24 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.55K Reposts · 11.9K Likes
64. By the end of the first day, the top execs are still trying to apply rules. By the next day, they will contemplate a major change in approach. Watch this weekend for the play-by-play of how all that went down.
1:26 AM · Dec 10, 2022
2.73K Reposts · 13.5K Likes
65. By January 8th, which will describe Sunday, Twitter will be receiving plaudits from “our partners” in Washington, and the sitting U.S. president will no longer be heard on the platform.
1:26 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.59K Reposts · 14.8K Likes
66. Lastly, people on the left, right, and in between want to know what else is in the , from suppression/shadow-banning of leftists to lab-leak theorists, or amplification of military propaganda or conservative accounts. We know everyone has questions.
1:28 AM · Dec 10, 2022
3.12K Reposts · 18.7K Likes
67. And while we’ve stumbled on tidbits here and there about topics ranging from COVID to foreign policy, the reality is the data sets are enormous and we’re still working through them.
More is coming. Good night, all.
1:29 AM · Dec 10, 2022
4.46K Reposts · 31.9K Likes
Note to Readers on the "Twitter Files":
open.substack.com
Note to Readers on the “Twitter Files”
5:16 PM · Dec 10, 2022
1.3K Reposts · 7.65K Likes
On the irony of releasing the “Twitter Files” on Twitter: “It’s using the uncontrollable virality of the medium to expose efforts to turn Twitter into an instrument of social control.”
taibbi.substack.com
Note to Readers on the “Twitter Files”
6:19 PM · Dec 10, 2022
1.61K Reposts · 8.42K Likes
Link to "The Twitter Files, Part 3":
open.substack.com
What’s in “The Twitter Files, Part 3”
9:29 PM · Dec 10, 2022
2.11K Reposts · 8.72K Likes
FBI/DHS/DNI cooperation, and other takeaways from the The Twitter Files, Part 3 “Nothingburger”
open.substack.com
What’s in “The Twitter Files, Part 3”
9:55 PM · Dec 10, 2022
2.15K Reposts · 9.25K Likes
Twitter is both a social media company and a crime scene
7:56 PM · Dec 10, 2022
95.1K Reposts · 692K Likes
Deplatforming the President (cont.) https://t.co/Q51Ala4SNz
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
1. TWITTER FILES, PART 4
The Removal of Donald Trump: January 7
As the pressure builds, Twitter executives build the case for a permanent ban
5:35 AM · Dec 11, 2022
34.7K Reposts · 180K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
1. TWITTER FILES, PART 4
The Removal of Donald Trump: January 7
As the pressure builds, Twitter executives build the case for a permanent ban
11:28 PM · Dec 10, 2022
38.3K Reposts · 114K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
On Jan 7, senior Twitter execs:
- create justifications to ban Trump
- seek a change of policy for Trump alone, distinct from other political leaders
- express no concern for the free speech or democracy implications of a ban
This is reported with
11:29 PM · Dec 10, 2022
8.19K Reposts · 40.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
For those catching up, please see:
Part 1, where documents how senior Twitter executives violated their own policies to prevent the spread of accurate information about Hunter Biden’s laptop;
1. Thread: THE TWITTER FILES
11:30 PM · Dec 10, 2022
6.09K Reposts · 30.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Part 2, where shows how senior Twitter execs created secret blacklists to “de-amplify” disfavored Twitter users, not just specific tweets;
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART TWO.
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
11:32 PM · Dec 10, 2022
5.46K Reposts · 28.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
And Part 3, where documents how senior Twitter execs censored tweets by Trump in the run-up to the Nov 2020 election while regularly engaging with representatives of U.S. government law enforcement agencies.
1. THREAD: The Twitter Files
THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP
Part One: October 2020-January 6th
11:32 PM · Dec 10, 2022
5.63K Reposts · 27.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
For years, Twitter had resisted calls to ban Trump.
“Blocking a world leader from Twitter,” it wrote in 2018, “would hide important info... [and] hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.”
Twitter Public Policy @Policy
Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets would hide important information people should be able to see and debate. It would also not silence that leader, but it would certainly hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.
11:35 PM · Dec 10, 2022
5.15K Reposts · 28.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
But after the events of Jan 6, the internal and external pressure on Twitter CEO grows.
Former First Lady , tech journalist , , high-tech VC , and many others, publicly call on Twitter to permanently ban Trump.
11:44 PM · Dec 10, 2022
7.1K Reposts · 29.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Dorsey was on vacation in French Polynesia the week of January 4-8, 2021. He phoned into meetings but also delegated much of the handling of the situation to senior execs , Twitter’s Global Head of Trust and Safety, and Head of Legal, Policy, & Trust.
11:48 PM · Dec 10, 2022
4.74K Reposts · 26.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
As context, it's important to understand that Twitter’s staff & senior execs were overwhelmingly progressive.
In 2018, 2020, and 2022, 96%, 98%, & 99% of Twitter staff's political donations went to Democrats.
11. This system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right. https://t.co/sa1uVRNhuH https://t.co/K1xmqQ0TrD
11:52 PM · Dec 10, 2022
6.21K Reposts · 28.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
In 2017, Roth tweeted that there were “ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.”
In April 2022, Roth told a colleague that his goal “is to drive change in the world,” which is why he decided not to become an academic.
11:54 PM · Dec 10, 2022
5.34K Reposts · 26.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
On January 7, emails employees saying Twitter needs to remain consistent in its policies, including the right of users to return to Twitter after a temporary suspension
After, Roth reassures an employee that "people who care about this... aren't happy with where we are"
11:59 PM · Dec 10, 2022
4.37K Reposts · 23.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Around 11:30 am PT, Roth DMs his colleagues with news that he is excited to share.
“GUESS WHAT,” he writes. “Jack just approved repeat offender for civic integrity.”
The new approach would create a system where five violations ("strikes") would result in permanent suspension.
12:09 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.58K Reposts · 23.4K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
“Progress!” exclaims a member of Roth’s Trust and Safety Team.
The exchange between Roth and his colleagues makes clear that they had been pushing for greater restrictions on the speech Twitter allows around elections.
12:12 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.03K Reposts · 24K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The colleague wants to know if the decision means Trump can finally be banned. The person asks, "does the incitement to violence aspect change that calculus?”
Roth says it doesn't. "Trump continues to just have his one strike" (remaining).
12:17 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.7K Reposts · 21.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Roth's colleague's query about "incitement to violence" heavily foreshadows what will happen the following day.
On January 8, Twitter announces a permanent ban on Trump due to the "risk of further incitement of violence."
12:24 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.02K Reposts · 21.8K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
On J8, Twitter says its ban is based on "specifically how [Trump's tweets] are being received & interpreted."
But in 2019, Twitter said it did "not attempt to determine all potential interpretations of the content or its intent.”
https://t.co/2jW1s5pH4W
12:31 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.33K Reposts · 23.4K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The *only* serious concern we found expressed within Twitter over the implications for free speech and democracy of banning Trump came from a junior person in the organization. It was tucked away in a lower-level Slack channel known as “site-integrity-auto."
12:38 AM · Dec 11, 2022
5.67K Reposts · 33.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
"This might be an unpopular opinion but one off ad hoc decisions like this that don’t appear rooted in policy are imho a slippery slope... This now appears to be a fiat by an online platform CEO with a global presence that can gatekeep speech for the entire world..."
12:40 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.24K Reposts · 26K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Twitter employees use the term "one off" frequently in their Slack discussions. Its frequent use reveals significant employee discretion over when and whether to apply warning labels on tweets and "strikes" on users. Here are typical examples.
12:45 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.28K Reposts · 20.2K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Recall from by that, according to Twitter staff, "We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do."
11. “We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do,” one Twitter engineer told us. Two additional Twitter employees confirmed.
1:08 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.95K Reposts · 21.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Twitter employees recognize the difference between their own politics & Twitter's Terms of Service (TOS), but they also engage in complex interpretations of content in order to stamp out prohibited tweets, as a series of exchanges over the "" hashtag reveal.
1:10 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.94K Reposts · 21.2K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Roth immediately DMs a colleague to ask that they add "stopthesteal" & [QAnon conspiracy term] "kraken" to a blacklist of terms to be deamplified.
Roth's colleague objects that blacklisting "stopthesteal" risks "deamplifying counterspeech" that validates the election.
1:23 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.72K Reposts · 19.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Indeed, notes Roth's colleague, "a quick search of top stop the steal tweets and they’re counterspeech"
But they quickly come up with a solution: "deamplify accounts with stopthesteal in the name/profile" since "those are not affiliated with counterspeech"
1:35 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.4K Reposts · 18.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
But it turns out that even blacklisting "kraken" is less straightforward than they thought. That's because kraken, in addition to being a QAnon conspiracy theory based on the mythical Norwegian sea monster, is also the name of a cryptocurrency exchange, and was thus "allowlisted"
1:44 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.03K Reposts · 18.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Employees struggle with whether to punish users who share screenshots of Trump's deleted J6 tweets
"we should bounce these tweets with a strike given the screen shot violates the policy"
"they are criticising Trump, so I am bit hesitant with applying strike to this user"
2:04 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.92K Reposts · 19.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
What if a user dislikes Trump *and* objects to Twitter's censorship? The tweet still gets deleted. But since the *intention* is not to deny the election result, no punishing strike is applied.
"if there are instances where the intent is unclear please feel free to raise"
2:16 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.34K Reposts · 18.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Around noon, a confused senior executive in advertising sales sends a DM to Roth.
Sales exec: "jack says: 'we will permanently suspend [Trump] if our policies are violated after a 12 hour account lock'… what policies is jack talking about?"
Roth: "*ANY* policy violation"
2:26 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.25K Reposts · 17.2K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
What happens next is essential to understanding how Twitter justified banning Trump.
Sales exec: "are we dropping the public interest [policy] now..."
Roth, six hours later: "In this specific case, we're changing our public interest approach for his account..."
2:32 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.93K Reposts · 18.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The ad exec is referring to Twitter’s policy of “Public-interest exceptions," which allows the content of elected officials, even if it violates Twitter rules, “if it directly contributes to understanding or discussion of a matter of public concern”
https://t.co/xTs14fD8V9
2:40 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2.61K Reposts · 15.8K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Roth pushes for a permanent suspension of Rep. Matt Gaetz even though it “doesn’t quite fit anywhere (duh)”
It's a kind of test case for the rationale for banning Trump.
“I’m trying to talk [Twitter’s] safety [team] into... removal as a conspiracy that incites violence.”
2:52 AM · Dec 11, 2022
4.7K Reposts · 20.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Around 2:30, comms execs DM Roth to say they don't want to make a big deal of the QAnon ban to the media because they fear "if we push this it looks we’re trying to offer up something in place of the thing everyone wants," meaning a Trump ban.
2:58 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2.77K Reposts · 16.4K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
That evening, a Twitter engineer DMs to Roth to say, "I feel a lot of debates around exceptions stem from the fact that Trump’s account is not technically different from anybody else’ and yet treated differently due to his personal status, without corresponding _Twitter rules_.."
3:00 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2K Reposts · 11.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Roth's response hints at how Twitter would justify deviating from its longstanding policy. "To put a different spin on it: policy is one part of the system of how Twitter works... we ran into the world changing faster than we were able to either adapt the product or the policy."
3:04 AM · Dec 11, 2022
1.94K Reposts · 10.8K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The evening of January 7, the same junior employee who expressed an "unpopular opinion" about "ad hoc decisions... that don’t appear rooted in policy," speaks up one last time before the end of the day.
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
"This might be an unpopular opinion but one off ad hoc decisions like this that don’t appear rooted in policy are imho a slippery slope... This now appears to be a fiat by an online platform CEO with a global presence that can gatekeep speech for the entire world..." https://t.co/4pedmgY8pa
3:07 AM · Dec 11, 2022
1.96K Reposts · 11K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Earlier that day, the employee wrote, "My concern is specifically surrounding the unarticulated logic of the decision by FB. That space fills with the idea (conspiracy theory?) that all... internet moguls... sit around like kings casually deciding what people can and cannot see."
3:12 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2.35K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The employee notes, later in the day, "And Will Oremus noticed the inconsistency too...," linking to an article for OneZero at Medium called, "Facebook Chucked Its Own Rulebook to Ban Trump."
onezero.medium.com
Facebook Chucked Its Own Rulebook to Ban Trump
3:14 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2.47K Reposts · 11.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
"The underlying problem," writes , is that “the dominant platforms have always been loath to own up to their subjectivity, because it highlights the extraordinary, unfettered power they wield over the global public square...
3:15 AM · Dec 11, 2022
2.39K Reposts · 12.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
"... and places the responsibility for that power on their own shoulders… So they hide behind an ever-changing rulebook, alternately pointing to it when it’s convenient and shoving it under the nearest rug when it isn’t.”
onezero.medium.com
Facebook Chucked Its Own Rulebook to Ban Trump
3:16 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.18K Reposts · 14.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
“Facebook’s suspension of Trump now puts Twitter in an awkward position. If Trump does indeed return to Twitter, the pressure on Twitter will ramp up to find a pretext on which to ban him as well.”
Indeed. And as will show tomorrow, that’s exactly what happened.
/END
3:17 AM · Dec 11, 2022
3.19K Reposts · 17.9K Likes
Under pressure from hundreds of activist employees, Twitter deplatforms Trump, a sitting US President, even though they themselves acknowledge that he didn’t violate the rules:
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART FIVE.
THE REMOVAL OF TRUMP FROM TWITTER.
7:36 PM · Dec 12, 2022
75.7K Reposts · 345K Likes
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART FIVE.
THE REMOVAL OF TRUMP FROM TWITTER.
6:06 PM · Dec 12, 2022
41.1K Reposts · 127K Likes
1. On the morning of January 8, President Donald Trump, with one remaining strike before being at risk of permanent suspension from Twitter, tweets twice.
6:06 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.32K Reposts · 32K Likes
2. 6:46 am: “The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”
6:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
6.11K Reposts · 37.7K Likes
3. 7:44 am: “To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”
6:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.01K Reposts · 28.5K Likes
4. For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate.
6:09 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.02K Reposts · 28.7K Likes
5. “Our mission is to provide a forum that enables people to be informed and to engage their leaders directly,” the company wrote in 2019. Twitter’s aim was to “protect the public’s right to hear from their leaders and to hold them to account.”
https://t.co/rtQjkQQxSs
6:09 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.75K Reposts · 25.2K Likes
6. But after January 6, as and have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump.
6:10 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.92K Reposts · 26K Likes
7. There were dissenters inside Twitter.
“Maybe because I am from China,” said one employee on January 7, “I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation.”
6:11 PM · Dec 12, 2022
7.47K Reposts · 37.3K Likes
8. But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier.
6:12 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.91K Reposts · 26.8K Likes
9. After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. “There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,” said one Twitter employee.
6:13 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.58K Reposts · 25K Likes
10. “We have to do the right thing and ban this account,” said one staffer.
It’s “pretty obvious he’s going to try to thread the needle of incitement without violating the rules,” said another.
6:15 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.09K Reposts · 23.9K Likes
11. In the early afternoon of January 8, The Washington Post published an open letter signed by over 300 Twitter employees to CEO Jack Dorsey demanding Trump’s ban. “We must examine Twitter’s complicity in what President-Elect Biden has rightly termed insurrection.”
6:16 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.24K Reposts · 24.6K Likes
12. But the Twitter staff assigned to evaluate tweets quickly concluded that Trump had *not* violated Twitter’s policies.“I think we’d have a hard time saying this is incitement,” wrote one staffer.
6:17 PM · Dec 12, 2022
6.04K Reposts · 31.5K Likes
13. “It's pretty clear he's saying the ‘American Patriots’ are the ones who voted for him and not the terrorists (we can call them that, right?) from Wednesday.”
6:17 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.01K Reposts · 25.2K Likes
14. Another staffer agreed: “Don’t see the incitement angle here.”
6:18 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.99K Reposts · 27.3K Likes
15. “I also am not seeing clear or coded incitement in the DJT tweet,” wrote Anika Navaroli, a Twitter policy official. “I’ll respond in the elections channel and say that our team has assessed and found no vios”—or violations—“for the DJT one.”
6:19 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.77K Reposts · 26K Likes
16. She does just that: “as an fyi, Safety has assessed the DJT Tweet above and determined that there is no violation of our policies at this time.”
6:23 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.46K Reposts · 25.2K Likes
17. (Later, Navaroli would testify to the House Jan. 6 committee:“For months I had been begging and anticipating and attempting to raise the reality that if nothing—if we made no intervention into what I saw occuring, people were going to die.”)
6:23 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.89K Reposts · 23.7K Likes
18. Next, Twitter’s safety team decides that Trump’s 7:44 am ET tweet is also not in violation. They are unequivocal: “it’s a clear no vio. It’s just to say he’s not attending the inauguration”
6:23 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.54K Reposts · 25.6K Likes
19. To understand Twitter’s decision to ban Trump, we must consider how Twitter deals with other heads of state and political leaders, including in Iran, Nigeria, and Ethiopia.
6:24 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.75K Reposts · 26.6K Likes
20. In June 2018, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tweeted, “ is a malignant cancerous tumor in the West Asian region that has to be removed and eradicated: it is possible and it will happen.”
Twitter neither deleted the tweet nor banned the Ayatollah.
6:31 PM · Dec 12, 2022
10.3K Reposts · 38.3K Likes
21. In October 2020, the former Malaysian Prime Minister said it was “a right” for Muslims to “kill millions of French people.”
Twitter deleted his tweet for “glorifying violence,” but he remains on the platform. The tweet below was taken from the Wayback Machine:
6:32 PM · Dec 12, 2022
8.25K Reposts · 33.4K Likes
22. Muhammadu Buhari, the President of Nigeria, incited violence against pro-Biafra groups.“Those of us in the fields for 30 months, who went through the war,” he wrote, “will treat them in the language they understand.”
Twitter deleted the tweet but didn't ban Buhari.
6:35 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.87K Reposts · 28K Likes
23. In October 2021, Twitter allowed Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed to call on citizens to take up arms against the Tigray region.
Twitter allowed the tweet to remain up, and did not ban the prime minister.
6:36 PM · Dec 12, 2022
6.74K Reposts · 28.6K Likes
24. In early February 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government threatened to arrest Twitter employees in India, and to incarcerate them for up to seven years after they restored hundreds of accounts that had been critical of him.
Twitter did not ban Modi.
6:37 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.99K Reposts · 27.9K Likes
25. But Twitter executives did ban Trump, even though key staffers said that Trump had not incited violence—not even in a “coded” way.
6:40 PM · Dec 12, 2022
7.4K Reposts · 33.4K Likes
26. Less than 90 minutes after Twitter employees had determined that Trump’s tweets were not in violation of Twitter policy, Vijaya Gadde—Twitter’s Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust—asked whether it could, in fact, be “coded incitement to further violence.”
6:40 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.64K Reposts · 26.5K Likes
27. A few minutes later, Twitter employees on the “scaled enforcement team” suggest that Trump’s tweet may have violated Twitter’s Glorification of Violence policy—if you interpreted the phrase “American Patriots” to refer to the rioters.
6:41 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.54K Reposts · 23.7K Likes
28. Things escalate from there.
Members of that team came to “view him as the leader of a terrorist group responsible for violence/deaths comparable to Christchurch shooter or Hitler and on that basis and on the totality of his Tweets, he should be de-platformed.”
6:41 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.07K Reposts · 25.3K Likes
29. Two hours later, Twitter executives host a 30-minute all-staff meeting.
Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde answer staff questions as to why Trump wasn’t banned yet.
But they make some employees angrier.
6:43 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.04K Reposts · 24K Likes
30. “Multiple tweeps [Twitter employees] have quoted the Banality of Evil suggesting that people implementing our policies are like Nazis following orders,” relays Yoel Roth to a colleague.
6:44 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.47K Reposts · 24.4K Likes
31. Dorsey requested simpler language to explain Trump’s suspension.
Roth wrote, “god help us [this] makes me think he wants to share it publicly”
6:45 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.26K Reposts · 17.2K Likes
32. One hour later, Twitter announces Trump’s permanent suspension “due to the risk of further incitement of violence.”
6:46 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.19K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
33. Many at Twitter were ecstatic.
6:49 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.35K Reposts · 17.8K Likes
34. And congratulatory: “big props to whoever in trust and safety is sitting there whack-a-mole-ing these trump accounts”
6:50 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.42K Reposts · 17.4K Likes
35. By the next day, employees expressed eagerness to tackle “medical misinformation” as soon as possible:
6:51 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.48K Reposts · 19.6K Likes
36. “For the longest time, Twitter’s stance was that we aren’t the arbiter of truth,” wrote another employee, “which I respected but never gave me a warm fuzzy feeling.”
6:52 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.21K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
36. “For the longest time, Twitter’s stance was that we aren’t the arbiter of truth,” wrote another employee, “which I respected but never gave me a warm fuzzy feeling.”
6:52 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.21K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
37. But Twitter’s COO Parag Agrawal—who would later succeed Dorsey as CEO—told Head of Security Mudge Zatko: “I think a few of us should brainstorm the ripple effects” of Trump's ban. Agrawal added: “centralized content moderation IMO has reached a breaking point now.”
6:53 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.04K Reposts · 17.1K Likes
38. Outside the United States, Twitter’s decision to ban Trump raised alarms, including with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Prime Minister Angela Merkel, and Mexico's President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
6:54 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.98K Reposts · 20.5K Likes
39. Macron told an audience he didn’t “want to live in a democracy where the key decisions” were made by private players. “I want it to be decided by a law voted by your representative, or by regulation, governance, democratically discussed and approved by democratic leaders.”
6:54 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.83K Reposts · 22.4K Likes
40. Merkel’s spokesperson called Twitter’s decision to ban Trump from its platform “problematic” and added that the freedom of opinion is of “elementary significance.”
Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny criticized the ban as “an unacceptable act of censorship.”
6:56 PM · Dec 12, 2022
4.24K Reposts · 23.6K Likes
41. Whether you agree with Navalny and Macron or the executives at Twitter, we hope this latest installment of gave you insight into that unprecedented decision.
7:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
2.65K Reposts · 20.1K Likes
42. From the outset, our goal in investigating this story was to discover and document the steps leading up to the banning of Trump and to put that choice into context.
7:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
2.42K Reposts · 17.8K Likes
43. Ultimately, the concerns about Twitter’s efforts to censor news about Hunter Biden’s laptop, blacklist disfavored views, and ban a president aren’t about the past choices of executives in a social media company.
7:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
3.44K Reposts · 20K Likes
44. They’re about the power of a handful of people at a private company to influence the public discourse and democracy.
7:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
5.39K Reposts · 30K Likes
45. This was reported by , , , , , . Follow all of our work at The Free Press:
7:08 PM · Dec 12, 2022
2.83K Reposts · 21.8K Likes
46. Please click here to subscribe to The Free Press, where you can continue reading and supporting independent journalism:
7:27 PM · Dec 12, 2022
2.14K Reposts · 14.8K Likes
Episode 16: "America This Week," with Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn
The makeup episode, in which and I
discuss the material that's come out in the "Twitter Files," laugh about the press reaction, and answer some questions we've received:
open.substack.com
Episode 16: “America This Week,” with Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn
11:15 PM · Dec 12, 2022
881 Reposts · 4.19K Likes
COMING at 4 est:
TWITTER: THE FBI SUBSIDIARY
8:44 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.3K Reposts · 22.5K Likes
1. THREAD: The Twitter Files, Part Six
TWITTER, THE FBI SUBSIDIARY
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
49.2K Reposts · 132K Likes
2. The are revealing more every day about how the government collects, analyzes, and flags your social media content.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
8.11K Reposts · 47.7K Likes
3. Twitter’s contact with the FBI was constant and pervasive, as if it were a subsidiary.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
10.2K Reposts · 50.1K Likes
4. Between January 2020 and November 2022, there were over 150 emails between the FBI and former Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
10.8K Reposts · 50K Likes
5. Some are mundane, like San Francisco agent Elvis Chan wishing Roth a Happy New Year along with a reminder to attend “our quarterly call next week.” Others are requests for information into Twitter users related to active investigations.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.95K Reposts · 39.1K Likes
6. But a surprisingly high number are requests by the FBI for Twitter to take action on election misinformation, even involving joke tweets from low-follower accounts.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
9.71K Reposts · 48.7K Likes
7. The FBI’s social media-focused task force, known as FTIF, created in the wake of the 2016 election, swelled to 80 agents and corresponded with Twitter to identify alleged foreign influence and election tampering of all kinds.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
8.33K Reposts · 42.4K Likes
8. Federal intelligence and law enforcement reach into Twitter included the Department of Homeland Security, which partnered with security contractors and think tanks to pressure Twitter to moderate content.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
8.28K Reposts · 41.4K Likes
9. It’s no secret the government analyzes bulk data for all sorts of purposes, everything from tracking terror suspects to making economic forecasts.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
4.95K Reposts · 34.5K Likes
10. The show something new: agencies like the FBI and DHS regularly sending social media content to Twitter through multiple entry points, pre-flagged for moderation.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
8.47K Reposts · 40.7K Likes
11. What stands out is the sheer quantity of reports from the government. Some are aggregated from public hotlines:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.75K Reposts · 32.1K Likes
unanswered question: do agencies like FBI and DHS do in-house flagging work themselves, or farm it out? “You have to prove to me that inside the fucking government you can do any kind of massive data or AI search,” says one former intelligence officer.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.51K Reposts · 33.7K Likes
“HELLO TWITTER CONTACTS”: The master-canine quality of the FBI’s relationship to Twitter comes through in this November 2022 email, in which “FBI San Francisco is notifying you” it wants action on four accounts:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
9.49K Reposts · 39.9K Likes
14.Twitter personnel in that case went on to look for reasons to suspend all four accounts, including , whose tweets are almost all jokes (see sample below), including his “civic misinformation” of Nov. 8:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.87K Reposts · 32.8K Likes
15. Just to show the FBI can be hyper-intrusive in both directions, they also asked Twitter to review a blue-leaning account for a different joke, except here it was even more obvious that , who kids a lot, was kidding:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.36K Reposts · 32.2K Likes
16. “Anyone who cannot discern obvious satire from reality has no place making decisions for others or working for the feds,” said , when told about the flagging.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.38K Reposts · 36.5K Likes
17.Of the six accounts mentioned in the previous two emails, all but two – and – were suspended.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
4.15K Reposts · 27.2K Likes
an internal email from November 5, 2022, the FBI’s National Election Command Post, which compiles and sends on complaints, sent the SF field office a long list of accounts that “may warrant additional action”:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
7.52K Reposts · 32.1K Likes
19.Agent Chan passed the list on to his "Twitter folks":
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.24K Reposts · 28K Likes
20. Twitter then replied with its list of actions taken. Note mercy shown to actor Billy Baldwin:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.84K Reposts · 28.9K Likes
21.Many of the above accounts were satirical in nature, nearly all (with the exceptions of Baldwin and ) were relatively low engagement, and some were suspended, most with a generic, “Thanks, Twitter” letter:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
4.74K Reposts · 26.9K Likes
22.When told of the FBI flagging, replied: “My thoughts initially include 1. Seems like prima facie 1A violation 2. Holy cow, me, an account with the reach of an amoeba 3. What else are they looking at?”
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
4.94K Reposts · 30.7K Likes
23.“I can't believe the FBI is policing jokes on Twitter. That's crazy,” said .
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
6.08K Reposts · 34.3K Likes
a letter to former Deputy General Counsel (and former top FBI lawyer) Jim Baker on Sep. 16, 2022, legal exec Stacia Cardille outlines results from her “soon to be weekly” meeting with DHS, DOJ, FBI, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
6.12K Reposts · 28.2K Likes
25.The Twitter exec writes she explicitly asked if there were “impediments” to the sharing of classified information “with industry.” The answer? “FBI was adamant no impediments to sharing exist.”
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.19K Reposts · 28.5K Likes
26. This passage underscores the unique one-big-happy-family vibe between Twitter and the FBI. With what other firm would the FBI blithely agree to “no impediments” to classified information?
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
6.06K Reposts · 31.9K Likes
the bottom of that letter, she lists a series of “escalations” apparently raised at the meeting, which were already “handled.”
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.26K Reposts · 19.8K Likes
28. About one, she writes: “Flagged a specific Tweet on Illinois use of modems to transmit election results in possible violation of the civic integrity policy (except they do use that tech in limited circumstances).”
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.98K Reposts · 22.1K Likes
29.Another internal letter from January, 2021 shows Twitter execs processing an FBI list of “possible violative content” tweets:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.81K Reposts · 20.7K Likes
, too, most tweets contained the same, “Get out there and vote Wednesday!” trope and had low engagement. This is what the FBI spends its time on:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
4.17K Reposts · 22.1K Likes
31. In this March, 2021 email, an FBI liaison thanks a senior Twitter exec for the chance to speak to “you and the team,” then delivers a packet of “products”:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.85K Reposts · 21.4K Likes
32.The executive circulates the “products,” which are really DHS bulletins stressing the need for greater collaboration between law enforcement and “private sector partners.”
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.87K Reposts · 14.7K Likes
33.The ubiquity of the 2016 Russian interference story as stated pretext for building out the censorship machine can’t be overstated. It’s analogous to how 9/11 inspired the expansion of the security state.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.01K Reposts · 19.3K Likes
34.While the DHS in its “products” pans “permissive” social media for offering “operational advantages” to Russians, it also explains that the “Domestic Violent Extremist Threat” requires addressing “information gaps”:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.5K Reposts · 13.9K Likes
35.FBI in one case sent over so many “possible violative content” reports, Twitter personnel congratulated each other in Slack for the “monumental undertaking” of reviewing them:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.58K Reposts · 16.4K Likes
36.There were multiple points of entry into Twitter for government-flagged reports. This letter from Agent Chan to Roth references Teleporter, a platform through which Twitter could receive reports from the FBI:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.26K Reposts · 14.9K Likes
37.Reports also came from different agencies. Here, an employee recommends “bouncing” content based on evidence from “DHS etc”:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.64K Reposts · 14.1K Likes
38.State governments also flagged content.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.16K Reposts · 15.9K Likes
39.Twitter for instance received reports via the Partner Support Portal, an outlet created by the Center for Internet Security, a partner organization to the DHS.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.64K Reposts · 14K Likes
40.“WHY WAS NO ACTION TAKEN?” Below, Twitter execs – receiving an alert from California officials, by way of “our partner support portal” – debate whether to act on a Trump tweet:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.28K Reposts · 15K Likes
, a video was reported by the Election Integrity Project (EIP) at Stanford, apparently on the strength of information from the Center for Internet Security (CIS):
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.8K Reposts · 13.7K Likes
42.If that’s confusing, it’s because the CIS is a DHS contractor, describes itself as “partners” with the Cyber and Internet Security Agency (CISA) at the DHS:
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.92K Reposts · 14.4K Likes
43.The EIP is one of a series of government-affiliated think tanks that mass-review content, a list that also includes the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensics Research Laboratory, and the University of Washington’s Center for Informed Policy.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.61K Reposts · 14.3K Likes
44.The takeaway: what most people think of as the “deep state” is really a tangled collaboration of state agencies, private contractors, and (sometimes state-funded) NGOs. The lines become so blurred as to be meaningless.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
7.13K Reposts · 28K Likes
45. Twitter Files researchers are moving into a variety of new areas now. Watch , , and this space for more, soon.
9:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.67K Reposts · 22.2K Likes
Here’s the FBI just a month ago asking Twitter for *location* information on a bunch of Twitter users, including the conservative news site . The FBI asks Twitter to “voluntarily provide” info and helpfully suggests these users violated Terms of Service.
https://t.co/ZQeb9Ko06p an internal email from November 5, 2022, the FBI’s National Election Command Post, which compiles and sends on complaints, sent the SF field office a long list of accounts that “may warrant additional action”: https://t.co/yILcgjFyev
9:06 PM · Dec 16, 2022
5.18K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
Instead of chasing child sex predators or terrorists, the FBI has agents — lots of them — analyzing and mass-flagging social media posts. Not as part of any criminal investigation, but as a permanent, end-in-itself surveillance operation. People should not be okay with this.
10:22 PM · Dec 16, 2022
48.4K Reposts · 168K Likes
The FBI pulled hundreds of agents off financial crime to War on Terror stuff in the 00's, resulting in missed signs of the financial crisis, incentives to invent terror plots. Now tons get assigned to social media so they inundate Twitter w/ takedown requests for joke accounts.
10:34 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.95K Reposts · 11.9K Likes
From the Twitter Files: Twitter, The FBI Subsidiary:
The latest documents show, in bulk, the master-canine relationship between the FBI and Twitter
open.substack.com
From the Twitter Files: Twitter, The FBI Subsidiary
10:36 PM · Dec 16, 2022
3.85K Reposts · 11.9K Likes
Episode 17: "America This Week," in which and discuss new Twitter Files/FBI revelations.
open.substack.com
Episode 17: “America This Week,” with Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn
10:43 PM · Dec 16, 2022
913 Reposts · 3.72K Likes
An FBI agent just reached out with a key point about the “gross” subservience of Twitter before the FBI: “A lot of companies we deal with are adversarial to us. Like T-Mobile is totally adversarial. They love leaking things we're saying if we don't get our process right.” (1/2)
11:09 PM · Dec 16, 2022
2.27K Reposts · 9.88K Likes
“I feel like that’s the default position. People used to get mad about that in the Bureau, but — they're supposed to represent their clients and their customers. Why in the hell would you expect them to make it easy on you? Do the right thing. Do it the right way.”
11:09 PM · Dec 16, 2022
1.07K Reposts · 7.65K Likes
The FBI replies to "The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities. Private sector entities independently make decisions about”
11:30 PM · Dec 16, 2022
934 Reposts · 4.68K Likes
“…what, if any, action they take on their platforms and for their customers after the FBI has notified them."
11:30 PM · Dec 16, 2022
151 Reposts · 1.24K Likes
Notes on FBI/Twitter Story, plus Link to Text Version of Twitter Files Thread:
open.substack.com
Notes on FBI/Twitter Story: Link to Text Version of Twitter Files Thread
5:52 PM · Dec 17, 2022
1.42K Reposts · 5.26K Likes
This FBI response is disingenuous on multiple fronts. None of this expains flagging the silly jokes of ordinary Americans with low follower counts. Also, they are clearly not doing this in service of investigating crime. This is about domestic intelligence and opinion control.
Jon Nicosia @NewsPolitics
The FBI replies to @mtaibbi "The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities. Private sector entities independently make decisions about”
5:58 PM · Dec 17, 2022
8.81K Reposts · 35.8K Likes
Josh, earlier this year I interviewed an FBI agent literally pulled off a child exploitation detail to chase misdemeanor J6 cases. Here the point is agents flagging social media instead of real work. This makes me “Pizzagate-curious”? How desperate for a point can you get?
Taibbi now officially pizzagate curious https://t.co/1LFgz9Ymr9
6:23 PM · Dec 17, 2022
4.48K Reposts · 23.9K Likes
Being on that committee you should know:
- How much has been spent, and how many DHS/DOJ employees have been assigned, to monitoring and flagging social media?
- Why is the FBI asking for "location information" about ordinary Americans and media outlets like ?
Dear @mtaibbi: I’m on the House Judiciary Committee that has oversight over the @FBI and you are lying. The FBI has lots of agents chasing child sex predators and terrorists. Please stop undermining and lying about federal law enforcement. https://t.co/nUcrwRyjRU
7:08 PM · Dec 17, 2022
11.1K Reposts · 57.8K Likes
- What "law enforcement" objective is served by asking for Billy Baldwin's location information?
- Why is the FBI/DHS in the business of analyzing and flagging social media content at all? When were these programs created and who approved them?
7:08 PM · Dec 17, 2022
5.9K Reposts · 32K Likes
Congressman Lieu, were you aware of this program and did you approve it? Simple questions require simple answers.
12:15 AM · Dec 18, 2022
14.4K Reposts · 104K Likes
Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley
The growing panic is evident. This hold-the-line warning is meant to stop a cascading failure in the once insurmountable wall of social-media censorship. If Facebook were to restore free-speech protections, the control over social media could evaporate...
jonathanturley.org
Censor or Else: Democratic Members Warn Facebook Not to “Backslide” on Censorship
6:21 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.45K Reposts · 7.55K Likes
Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley
...Democrats fear Facebook and other social media companies might “backslide” into free speech as Facebook is faced with declining revenues and ordering layoffs. These members specifically want assurances that those layoffs will not reduce the staff censoring social media...
6:22 PM · Dec 18, 2022
450 Reposts · 1.86K Likes
Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley
...The letter to Clegg is reminiscent of another letter sent by several congressional Democrats to cable-TV carriers last year, demanding to know why they continue to carry Fox News.
jonathanturley.org
“Not All TV News Sources Are The Same”: Congress And The Slippery Slope Of Censorship
6:24 PM · Dec 18, 2022
344 Reposts · 1.35K Likes
1.THREAD: Twitter Files Supplemental
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
19.5K Reposts · 58.8K Likes
July of 2020, San Francisco FBI agent Elvis Chan tells Twitter executive Yoel Roth to expect written questions from the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), the inter-agency group that deals with cyber threats.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
4.47K Reposts · 21.6K Likes
3.The questionnaire authors seem displeased with Twitter for implying, in a July 20th “DHS/ODNI/FBI/Industry briefing,” that “you indicated you had not observed much recent activity from official propaganda actors on your platform.”
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
3.8K Reposts · 19K Likes
would think that would be good news. The agencies seemed to feel otherwise.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.71K Reposts · 18.4K Likes
5.Chan underscored this: “There was quite a bit of discussion within the USIC to get clarifications from your company,” he wrote, referring to the United States Intelligence Community.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.79K Reposts · 17.1K Likes
6.The task force demanded to know how Twitter came to its unpopular conclusion. Oddly, it included a bibliography of public sources - including a Wall Street Journal article - attesting to the prevalence of foreign threats, as if to show Twitter they got it wrong.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.91K Reposts · 17.6K Likes
7.Roth, receiving the questions, circulated them with other company executives, and complained that he was “frankly perplexed by the requests here, which seem more like something we'd get from a congressional committee than the Bureau.”
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
3.29K Reposts · 18K Likes
8.He added he was not “comfortable with the Bureau (and by extension the IC) demanding written answers.” The idea of the FBI acting as conduit for the Intelligence Community is interesting, given that many agencies are barred from domestic operations.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
3.79K Reposts · 20.6K Likes
9.He then sent another note internally, saying the premise of the questions was “flawed,” because “we've been clear that official state propaganda is definitely a thing on Twitter.” Note the italics for emphasis.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
3.09K Reposts · 17K Likes
10.Roth suggested they “get on the phone with Elvis ASAP and try to straighten this out,” to disabuse the agencies of any notion that state propaganda is not a “thing” on Twitter.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.68K Reposts · 16.4K Likes
11.This exchange is odd among other things because some of the “bibliography” materials cited by the FITF are sourced to intelligence officials, who in turn cited the public sources.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.82K Reposts · 17.1K Likes
12.The FBI responded to Friday’s report by saying it “regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities.”
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.98K Reposts · 16.2K Likes
13.That may be true, but we haven’t seen that in the documents to date. Instead, we’ve mostly seen requests for moderation involving low-follower accounts belonging to ordinary Americans – and Billy Baldwin.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
3.47K Reposts · 20.7K Likes
and for more from the Twitter Files.
11:03 PM · Dec 18, 2022
2.69K Reposts · 15.3K Likes
Notes from the Twitter Files: Twitter and the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF)
Twitter didn't just take moderation requests from government, it made rapid attitude adjustments. More below:
open.substack.com
Notes from the Twitter Files: Twitter and the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF)
11:25 PM · Dec 18, 2022
1.71K Reposts · 5.43K Likes
No. It should be driven by the FBI, DHS, and ODNI, right? https://t.co/jxt2S2ADeS
18. So yes, let's talk about free speech and let's talk about safety. But Twitter is a platform that is used by hundreds of millions of people.
THE SITE'S RULES SHOULD NOT BE DRIVEN BY THE QUIXOTIC INTERESTS OF ONE BILLIONAIRE
HE BOUGHT IT, BUT HE ALSO NEEDS USERS TO BUY IN
11:37 PM · Dec 18, 2022
971 Reposts · 6.77K Likes
It is very odd that people (cough, ) think the FBI/DHS relationship with Twitter and other platforms is a partisan story. It’s taken place and grown under both Republican and Democratic administrations. This concerns everyone.
11:50 PM · Dec 18, 2022
7.07K Reposts · 40.9K Likes
Back in 2012 Congressional *Dems* hosted an investigation of the Dept of Homeland Security for violating civil liberties and chilling First Amendment speech for simply engaging in social media/Twitter *monitoring*. Now bc of polarization Dems defend direct DHS/FBI intervention.
It is very odd that people (cough, @tedlieu) think the FBI/DHS relationship with Twitter and other platforms is a partisan story. It’s taken place and grown under both Republican and Democratic administrations. This concerns everyone.
11:55 PM · Dec 18, 2022
1.47K Reposts · 5.14K Likes
Note the language in this email by former Twitter executive: the company is dealing with “the Bureau (and by extension the IC).” Remember that some intelligence agencies have used the FBI as a legal end-around to pursue domestic missions:
7.Roth, receiving the questions, circulated them with other company executives, and complained that he was “frankly perplexed by the requests here, which seem more like something we'd get from a congressional committee than the Bureau.” https://t.co/SrLrdZLREa
11:57 PM · Dec 18, 2022
1.15K Reposts · 4.68K Likes
“Starting to hear from partners.”
12:36 AM · Dec 19, 2022
3.1K Reposts · 14.8K Likes
The context: January 8th, 2021, a few hours before Trump was banned from the platform.
@mtaibbi Zero context. Mr “Innuendo” Taibbi is up to his old tricks. Just like Assange and the nothing burger Podesta Emails. This is an old Soviet propaganda technique. Actually, older than that.
12:52 AM · Dec 19, 2022
921 Reposts · 6.19K Likes
Then hastily reassured them that they would agree. But then, reading comprehension skills aren’t a prerequisite for public office.
I read this breathless “Twitter Files Supplemental” from @mtaibbi so you don’t have to. Here’s the summary: Twitter disagreed with the FBI.
You’re welcome. https://t.co/2AtyMSkvWY
12:55 AM · Dec 19, 2022
3.17K Reposts · 21.6K Likes
Once we had a standard in this country that the FBI had to at least have some indication of possible crime to initiate investigations. No longer. They can “pre-assess” at will, with no chargeable crime in sight, and people like you are fine with it.
Reasonable Liberal @itouchcoral
@mtaibbi Matt what is wrong with the FBI looking at social media posts? When Islamic terrorism was a more acute threat - that was totally ok.
This is how they catch bad guys before bad things happen.
Why is it not “real work” if it’s looking out for domestic terror?
1:53 AM · Dec 19, 2022
5.45K Reposts · 27.9K Likes
Interview with Russell Brand: The Twitter Files
open.substack.com
Interview with Russell Brand: The Twitter Files
2:41 PM · Dec 19, 2022
1.11K Reposts · 5.8K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
1. TWITTER FILES: PART 7
The FBI & the Hunter Biden Laptop
How the FBI & intelligence community discredited factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both after and *before* The New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14, 2020
4:09 PM · Dec 19, 2022
56.2K Reposts · 159K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
In Twitter Files #6, we saw the FBI relentlessly seek to exercise influence over Twitter, including over its content, its users, and its data.
1. THREAD: The Twitter Files, Part Six
TWITTER, THE FBI SUBSIDIARY
4:11 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5K Reposts · 26.4K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
In Twitter Files #7, we present evidence pointing to an organized effort by representatives of the intelligence community (IC), aimed at senior executives at news and social media companies, to discredit leaked information about Hunter Biden before and after it was published.
4:13 PM · Dec 19, 2022
7.18K Reposts · 32K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
The story begins in December 2019 when a Delaware computer store owner named John Paul (J.P.) Mac Isaac contacts the FBI about a laptop that Hunter Biden had left with him
On Dec 9, 2019, the FBI issues a subpoena for, and takes, Hunter Biden's laptop.
4:18 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.63K Reposts · 26.2K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
By Aug 2020, Mac Isaac still had not heard back from the FBI, even though he had discovered evidence of criminal activity. And so he emails Rudy Giuliani, who was under FBI surveillance at the time. In early Oct, Giuliani gives it to
nypost.com
Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
4:21 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.69K Reposts · 26.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Shortly before 7 pm ET on October 13, Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, emails JP Mac Isaac.
Hunter and Mesires had just learned from the New York Post that its story about the laptop would be published the next day.
4:22 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.09K Reposts · 21.2K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
7. At 9:22 pm ET (6:22 PT), FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan sends 10 documents to Twitter’s then-Head of Site Integrity, Yoel Roth, through Teleporter, a one-way communications channel from the FBI to Twitter.
4:25 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.51K Reposts · 24.5K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
8. The next day, October 14, 2020, The New York Post runs its explosive story revealing the business dealings of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. Every single fact in it was accurate.
4:26 PM · Dec 19, 2022
7.96K Reposts · 32K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
9. And yet, within hours, Twitter and other social media companies censor the NY Post article, preventing it from spreading and, more importantly, undermining its credibility in the minds of many Americans.
Why is that? What, exactly, happened?
4:27 PM · Dec 19, 2022
6.82K Reposts · 34.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
10. On Dec 2, described the debate inside Twitter over its decision to censor a wholly accurate article.
Since then, we have discovered new info that points to an organized effort by the intel community to influence Twitter & other platforms
1. Thread: THE TWITTER FILES
4:32 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.07K Reposts · 25.6K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
11. First, it's important to understand that Hunter Biden earned *tens of millions* of dollars in contracts with foreign businesses, including ones linked to China's government, for which Hunter offered no real work.
Here's an overview by investigative journalist
4:36 PM · Dec 19, 2022
11.4K Reposts · 38.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
12. And yet, during all of 2020, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies repeatedly primed Yoel Roth to dismiss reports of Hunter Biden’s laptop as a Russian “hack and leak” operation.
This is from a sworn declaration by Roth given in December 2020.
4:40 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.91K Reposts · 26K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
13. They did the same to Facebook, according to CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “The FBI basically came to us [and] was like, ‘Hey... you should be on high alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in 2016 election. There's about to be some kind of dump similar to that.'"
4:43 PM · Dec 19, 2022
6.01K Reposts · 28K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
14. Were the FBI warnings of a Russian hack-and-leak operation relating to Hunter Biden based on *any* new intel?
No, they weren't
“Through our investigations, we did not see any similar competing intrusions to what had happened in 2016,” admitted FBI agent Elvis Chan in Nov.
4:48 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.48K Reposts · 25K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
15. Indeed, Twitter executives *repeatedly* reported very little Russian activity.
E.g., on Sept 24, 2020, Twitter told FBI it had removed 345 “largely inactive” accounts “linked to previous coordinated Russian hacking attempts.” They “had little reach & low follower accounts."
4:57 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.18K Reposts · 21.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
16. In fact, Twitter debunked false claims by journalists of foreign influence on its platform
"We haven’t seen any evidence to support that claim” by News of foreign-controlled bots.
“Our review thus far shows a small-scale domestic troll effort…”
5:06 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.87K Reposts · 20.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
17. After FBI asks about a WaPo story on alleged foreign influence in a pro-Trump tweet, Twitter's Roth says, "The article makes a lot of insinuations... but we saw no evidence that that was the case here (and in fact, a lot of strong evidence pointing in the other direction).”
5:11 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.73K Reposts · 20K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
18. It's not the first time that Twitter's Roth has pushed back against the FBI. In January 2020, Roth resisted FBI efforts to get Twitter to share data outside of the normal search warrant process.
5:14 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.67K Reposts · 20.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
19. Pressure had been growing:
“We have seen a sustained (If uncoordinated) effort by the IC [intelligence community] to push us to share more info & change our API policies. They are probing & pushing everywhere they can (including by whispering to congressional staff).”
5:16 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.94K Reposts · 19.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
20. Time and again, FBI asks Twitter for evidence of foreign influence & Twitter responds that they aren’t finding anything worth reporting.
“[W]e haven’t yet identified activity that we’d typically refer to you (or even flag as interesting in the foreign influence context).”
5:21 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.14K Reposts · 20.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
21. Despite Twitter’s pushback, the FBI repeatedly requests information from Twitter that Twitter has already made clear it will not share outside of normal legal channels.
5:24 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.64K Reposts · 19.1K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
22. Then, in July 2020, the FBI’s Elvis Chan arranges for temporary Top Secret security clearances for Twitter executives so that the FBI can share information about threats to the upcoming elections.
5:25 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.92K Reposts · 20.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
23. On August 11, 2020, the FBI's Chan shares information with Twitter's Roth relating to the Russian hacking organization, APT28, through the FBI's secure, one-way communications channel, Teleporter.
5:26 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.25K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
24. Recently, Yoel Roth told that he had been primed to think about the Russian hacking group APT28 before news of the Hunter Biden laptop came out.
When it did, Roth said, "It set off every single one of my finely tuned APT28 hack-and-leap campaign alarm bells."
5:31 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.23K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
25. In Aug, 2020, FBI’s Chan asks Twitter: does anyone there have top secret clearance?
When someone mentions Jim Baker, Chan responds, "I don't know how I forgot him" — an odd claim, given Chan's job is to monitor Twitter, not to mention that they worked together at the FBI.
5:36 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.89K Reposts · 19K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
26. Who is Jim Baker? He's former general counsel of the FBI (2014-18) & one of the most powerful men in the U.S. intel community.
Baker has moved in and out of government for 30 years, serving stints at CNN, Bridgewater (a $140 billion asset management firm) and Brookings
5:40 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.14K Reposts · 18.9K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
27. As general counsel of the FBI, Baker played a central role in making the case internally for an investigation of Donald Trump
wsj.com
FBI Took Michael Sussmann’s Allegation of Trump-Russia Ties Seriously, Former Official Testifies
5:42 PM · Dec 19, 2022
3.93K Reposts · 18.8K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
28. Baker wasn't the only senior FBI exec. involved in the Trump investigation to go to Twitter.
Dawn Burton, the former dep. chief of staff to FBI head James Comey, who initiated the investigation of Trump, joined Twitter in 2019 as director of strategy.
5:42 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.75K Reposts · 20K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
29. As of 2020, there were so many former FBI employees — "Bu alumni" — working at Twitter that they had created their own private Slack channel and a crib sheet to onboard new FBI arrivals.
5:44 PM · Dec 19, 2022
7.76K Reposts · 26.4K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
30. Efforts continued to influence Twitter's Yoel Roth.
In Sept 2020, Roth participated in an Aspen Institute “tabletop exercise” on a potential "Hack-and-Dump" operation relating to Hunter Biden
The goal was to shape how the media covered it — and how social media carried it
5:47 PM · Dec 19, 2022
5.1K Reposts · 21.3K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
31. The organizer was Vivian Schiller, the fmr CEO of NPR, fmr head of news at Twitter; fmr Gen. mgr of NY Times; fmr Chief Digital Officer of NBC News
Attendees included Meta/FB's head of security policy and the top nat. sec. reporters for and others
5:51 PM · Dec 19, 2022
4.23K Reposts · 19.5K Likes
1. TWITTER FILES PART 8
*How Twitter Quietly Aided the Pentagon’s Covert Online PsyOp Campaign*
Despite promises to shut down covert state-run propaganda networks, Twitter docs show that the social media giant directly assisted the U.S. military’s influence operations.
8:02 PM · Dec 20, 2022
31.4K Reposts · 70.4K Likes
2. Twitter has claimed for years that they make concerted efforts to detect & thwart gov-backed platform manipulation. Here is Twitter testifying to Congress about its pledge to rapidly identify and shut down all state-backed covert information operations & deceptive propaganda.
8:05 PM · Dec 20, 2022
4.47K Reposts · 20.6K Likes
3. But behind the scenes, Twitter gave approval & special protection to the U.S. military’s online psychological influence ops. Despite knowledge that Pentagon propaganda accounts used covert identities, Twitter did not suspend many for around 2 years or more. Some remain active.
8:08 PM · Dec 20, 2022
4.87K Reposts · 20K Likes
4. In 2017, a U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) official sent Twitter a list of 52 Arab language accounts “we use to amplify certain messages.” The official asked for priority service for six accounts, verification for one & “whitelist” abilities for the others.
8:11 PM · Dec 20, 2022
4.48K Reposts · 18.2K Likes
5. The same day CENTCOM sent the list, Twitter officials used a tool to grant a special “whitelist” tag that essentially provides verification status to the accounts w/o the blue check, meaning they are exempt from spam/abuse flags, more visible/likely to trend on hashtags.
8:12 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.41K Reposts · 16.4K Likes
6. The CENTCOM accounts on the list tweeted frequently about U.S. military priorities in the Middle East, including promoting anti-Iran messages, promotion of the Saudi Arabia-U.S. backed war in Yemen, and “accurate” U.S. drone strikes that claimed to only hit terrorists.
8:15 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.79K Reposts · 16.5K Likes
7. CENTCOM then shifted strategies & deleted disclosures of ties to the Twitter accounts. The bios of the accounts changed to seemingly organic profiles. One bio read: “Euphrates pulse.” Another used an apparent deep fake profile pic & claimed to be a source of Iraqi opinion.
8:17 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.85K Reposts · 14.3K Likes
8. One Twitter official who spoke to me said he feels deceived by the covert shift. Still, many emails from throughout 2020 show that high-level Twitter executives were well aware of DoD’s vast network of fake accounts & covert propaganda and did not suspend the accounts.
8:19 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.86K Reposts · 16.7K Likes
9. For example, Twitter lawyer Jim Baker mused in a July 2020 email, about an upcoming DoD meeting, that the Pentagon used "poor tradecraft" in setting up its network, and were seeking strategies for not exposing the accounts that are “linked to each other or to DoD or the USG.”
8:21 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.16K Reposts · 14.9K Likes
10. Stacia Cardille, another Twitter attorney, replied that the Pentagon wanted a SCIF & may want to retroactively classify its social media activities “to obfuscate their activity in this space, and that this may represent an overclassification to avoid embarrassment.”
8:25 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.15K Reposts · 14.1K Likes
11. In several other 2020 emails, high-level Twitter executives/lawyers discussed the covert network and even recirculated the 2017 list from CENTCOM and shared another list of 157 undisclosed Pentagon accounts, again mostly focused on Middle East military issues.
8:28 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.57K Reposts · 13K Likes
12. In a May 2020 email, Twitter’s Lisa Roman emailed the DoD w/two lists. One list was accounts “previously provided to us” & another list Twitter detected. The accounts tweeted in Russian & Arabic on US military issues in Syria/ISIS & many also did not disclose Pentagon ties.
8:30 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.57K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
13. Many of these secretive U.S. military propaganda accounts, despite detection by Twitter as late as 2020 (but potentially earlier) continued tweeting through this year, some not suspended until May 2022 or later, according to records I reviewed.
8:31 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.75K Reposts · 13.4K Likes
14. In August 2022, a Stanford Internet Observatory report exposed a U.S. military covert propaganda network on Facebook, Telegram, Twitter & other apps using fake news portals and deep fake images and memes against U.S. foreign adversaries.
public-assets.graphika.com
8:33 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.43K Reposts · 14.1K Likes
15. The U.S. propaganda network relentlessly pushed narratives against Russia, China, and other foreign countries. They accused Iran of "threatening Iraq’s water security and flooding the country with crystal meth," and of harvesting the organs of Afghan refugees.
8:34 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.19K Reposts · 13.8K Likes
16. The Stanford report did not identify all of the accounts in the network but one they did name was the exact same Twitter account CENTCOM asked for whitelist privileges in its 2017 email. I verified via Twitter’s internal tools. The account used an AI-created deep fake image.
8:37 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.06K Reposts · 13.2K Likes
17. In subsequent reporting, Twitter was cast as an unbiased hero for removing “a network of fake user accounts promoting pro-Western policy positions.” Media covering the story described Twitter as evenly applying its policies & proactive in suspending the DoD network.
8:41 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.23K Reposts · 11.8K Likes
18. The reality is much more murky. Twitter actively assisted CENTCOM’s network going back to 2017 and as late as 2020 knew these accounts were covert/designed to deceive to manipulate the discourse, a violation of Twitter’s policies & promises. They waited years to suspend.
8:42 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.12K Reposts · 13.4K Likes
19. Twitter’s comms team was closely in touch with reporters, working to minimize Twitter’s role. When the WashPost reported on the scandal, Twitter officials congratulated each other because the story didn’t mention any Twitter employees & focused largely on the Pentagon.
8:46 PM · Dec 20, 2022
3.07K Reposts · 12.8K Likes
20. The conduct with the U.S. military’s covert network stands in stark contrast with how Twitter has boasted about rapidly identifying and taking down covert accounts tied to state-backed influence operations, including Thailand, Russia, Venezuela, and others since 2016.
8:48 PM · Dec 20, 2022
2.54K Reposts · 12.4K Likes
21. Here is my reported piece w/more detail. I was given access to Twitter for a few days. I signed/agreed to nothing, Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by a Twitter attorney, so what I saw could be limited.
theintercept.com
Twitter Aided the Pentagon in its Covert Online Propaganda Campaign
8:51 PM · Dec 20, 2022
5.11K Reposts · 17.2K Likes
If you want details about how I go about my reporting, a little more about myself, and further documentation & discussion, I just started a Substack. Sign up here:
leefang.substack.com
Creating a Substack
9:58 PM · Dec 20, 2022
1.06K Reposts · 7.09K Likes
🚨BREAKING: The FBI responds to releasing the Twitter files:
"It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency."
8:05 PM · Dec 21, 2022
567 Reposts · 1.86K Likes
Gurbaksh Singh Chahal @gchahal
. rather make money off selling child porn on rather than show how terrorists killing children.
You gotta take a dirty shower every fucking day...no matter how much you get paid a day...to do that dirty shit you mother fucker.
6:22 PM · Oct 1, 2022
72 Reposts · 226 Likes
and that Agrawal was arrested by the F.B.I. at his home in California for possession of that material. Furthermore, they report,
The executive not only collected child abuse material off of Twitter and other social media platforms, he turned a blind eye to users that shared the same material on the social media platform.
Twitter was a haven for child porn until Elon Musk took over.
Musk stated to the Vancouver Times that even more arrests are expected in the future. The billionaire has repeatedly stated that tackling child porn is Twitter’s #1 priority.
https://vancouvertimes.org/former-twitter-ceo-parag-agrawal-arrested-for-child-porn/
Some people have tweeted about this apparently without realizing that they it was satire.
NYT apparently asked for access to Twitter files
nytimes.com
Twitter Is Said to Have Struggled Over Revealing U.S. Influence Campaign
3:26 PM · Dec 24, 2022
180 Reposts · 647 Likes
1.THREAD: The Twitter Files
TWITTER AND "OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES"
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
11.4K Reposts · 25.4K Likes
After weeks of “Twitter Files” reports detailing close coordination between the FBI and Twitter in moderating social media content, the Bureau issued a statement Wednesday.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.52K Reposts · 8.38K Likes
didn’t refute allegations. Instead, it decried “conspiracy theorists” publishing “misinformation,” whose “sole aim” is to “discredit the agency.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.81K Reposts · 10.1K Likes
3.They must think us unambitious, if our “sole aim” is to discredit the FBI. After all, a whole range of government agencies discredit themselves in the . Why stop with one?
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
2.15K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
4.The files show the FBI acting as doorman to a vast program of social media surveillance and censorship, encompassing agencies across the federal government – from the State Department to the Pentagon to the CIA.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
2.69K Reposts · 11.3K Likes
5.The operation is far bigger than the reported 80 members of the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), which also facilitates requests from a wide array of smaller actors - from local cops to media to state governments.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.82K Reposts · 9.36K Likes
6.Twitter had so much contact with so many agencies that executives lost track. Is today the DOD, and tomorrow the FBI? Is it the weekly call, or the monthly meeting? It was dizzying.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.85K Reposts · 9.14K Likes
7.A chief end result was that thousands of official “reports” flowed to Twitter from all over, through the FITF and the FBI’s San Francisco field office.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.29K Reposts · 7.94K Likes
8.On June 29th, 2020, San Francisco FBI agent Elvis Chan wrote to pair of Twitter execs asking if he could invite an “OGA” to an upcoming conference:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.46K Reposts · 7.91K Likes
9.OGA, or “Other Government Organization,” can be a euphemism for CIA, according to multiple former intelligence officials and contractors. Chuckles one: “They think it's mysterious, but it's just conspicuous."
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.17K Reposts · 6.14K Likes
10.“Other Government Agency (the place where I worked for 27 years),” says retired CIA officer Ray McGovern.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
957 Reposts · 5.82K Likes
11. It was an open secret at Twitter that one of its executives was ex-CIA, which is why Chan referred to that executive’s “former employer.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.17K Reposts · 6.07K Likes
12.The first Twitter executive abandoned any pretense to stealth and emailed that the employee “used to work for the CIA, so that is Elvis’s question.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.03K Reposts · 5.7K Likes
13.Senior legal executive Stacia Cardille, whose alertness stood out among Twitter leaders, replied, “I know” and “I thought my silence was understood.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
811 Reposts · 5.09K Likes
14.Cardille then passes on conference details to recently-hired ex-FBI lawyer Jim Baker.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
977 Reposts · 5.28K Likes
15.“I invited the FBI and the CIA virtually will attend too,” Cardille says to Baker, adding pointedly: “No need for you to attend.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
938 Reposts · 5.46K Likes
16.The government was in constant contact not just with Twitter but with virtually every major tech firm.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.91K Reposts · 7.51K Likes
17. These included Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon, Reddit, even Pinterest, and many others. Industry players also held regular meetings without government.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.77K Reposts · 7.14K Likes
of the most common forums was a regular meeting of the multi-agency Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), attended by spates of executives, FBI personnel, and – nearly always – one or two attendees marked “OGA.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.27K Reposts · 5.89K Likes
19.The FITF meeting agendas virtually always included, at or near the beginning, an “OGA briefing,” usually about foreign matters (hold that thought).
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1K Reposts · 5.26K Likes
20. Despite its official remit being “Foreign Influence,” the FITF and the SF FBI office became conduit for mountains of domestic moderation requests, from state governments, even local police:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.13K Reposts · 5.28K Likes
21. Many requests arrived via Teleporter, a one-way platform in which many communications were timed to vanish:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.05K Reposts · 5.15K Likes
22.Especially as the election approached in 2020, the FITF/FBI overwhelmed Twitter with requests, sending lists of hundreds of problem accounts:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.28K Reposts · 5.4K Likes
23. Email after email came from the San Francisco office heading into the election, often adorned with an Excel attachment:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.03K Reposts · 5.07K Likes
24. There were so many government requests, Twitter employees had to improvise a system for prioritizing/triaging them:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.26K Reposts · 5.34K Likes
25. The FBI was clearly tailoring searches to Twitter’s policies. FBI complaints were almost always depicted somewhere as a “possible terms of service violation," even in the subject line:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
943 Reposts · 5.12K Likes
26. Twitter executives noticed the FBI appeared to be aasigning personnel to look for Twitter violations.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.14K Reposts · 5.36K Likes
27.“They have some folks in the Baltimore field office and at HQ that are just doing keyword searches for violations. This is probably the 10th request I have dealt with in the last 5 days,” remarked Cardille.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.03K Reposts · 5.02K Likes
28. Even ex-FBI lawyer Jim Baker agreed: “Odd that they are searching for violations of our policies.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1K Reposts · 5.17K Likes
29.The New York FBI office even sent requests for the “user IDs and handles” of a long list of accounts named in a Daily Beast article. Senior executives say they are “supportive” and “completely comfortable” doing so.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.12K Reposts · 5.02K Likes
30. It seemed to strike no one as strange that a “Foreign Influence” task force was forwarding thousands of mostly domestic reports, along with the DHS, about the fringiest material:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.44K Reposts · 5.66K Likes
31. “Foreign meddling” had been the ostensible justification for expanded moderation since platforms like Twitter were dragged to the Hill by the Senate in 2017:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
771 Reposts · 4.26K Likes
32. Yet behind the scenes, Twitter executives struggled against government claims of foreign interference supposedly occurring on their platform and others:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
694 Reposts · 4.06K Likes
33. The show execs under constant pressure to validate theories of foreign influence – and unable to find evidence for key assertions.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.06K Reposts · 4.81K Likes
34. “Found no links to Russia,” says one analyst, but suggests he could “brainstorm” to “find a stronger connection.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.58K Reposts · 5.77K Likes
35. “Extremely tenuous circumstantial chance of being related,” says another.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
695 Reposts · 4.16K Likes
36. “No real matches using the info,” says former Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth in another case, noting some links were “clearly Russian,” but another was a “house rental in South Carolina?”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
732 Reposts · 4.11K Likes
37. In another case, Roth concludes a series of Venezuelan pro-Maduro accounts are unrelated to Russia’s Internet Research Agency, because they’re too high-volume:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
687 Reposts · 3.92K Likes
38.The Venezuelans “were extremely high-volume tweeters… pretty uncharacteristic of a lot of the other IRA activity,” Roth says.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
605 Reposts · 3.92K Likes
39. In a key email, news that the State Department was making a wobbly public assertion of Russian influence led an exec – the same one with the “OGA” past - to make a damning admission:
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
673 Reposts · 3.98K Likes
40. “Due to a lack of technical evidence on our end, I've generally left it be, waiting for more evidence,” he says. “Our window on that is closing, given that government partners are becoming more aggressive on attribution.”
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
900 Reposts · 4.39K Likes
41. Translation: “more aggressive” “government partners” had closed Twitter’s “window” of independence.
5:20 PM · Dec 24, 2022
932 Reposts · 4.52K Likes
42. “Other Government Agencies” ended up sharing intelligence through the FBI and FITF not just with Twitter, but with Yahoo!, Twitch, Clouldfare, LinkedIn, even Wikimedia:
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.12K Reposts · 4.46K Likes
43. Former CIA agent and whistleblower John Kiriakou believes he recognizes the formatting of these reports.
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
706 Reposts · 4.27K Likes
44.“Looks right on to me,” Kiriakou says, noting that “what was cut off above [the “tearline”] was the originating CIA office and all the copied offices.”
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
752 Reposts · 4.22K Likes
45. Many people wonder if Internet platforms receive direction from intelligence agencies about moderation of foreign policy news stories. It appears Twitter did, in some cases by way of the FITF/FBI.
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.01K Reposts · 4.84K Likes
46. These reports are far more factually controversial than domestic counterparts.
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
616 Reposts · 3.98K Likes
47. One intel report lists accounts tied to “Ukraine ‘neo-Nazi’ Propaganda.’” This includes assertions that Joe Biden helped orchestrate a coup in 2014 and “put his son on the board of Burisma.”
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.48K Reposts · 5.14K Likes
48. Another report asserts a list of accounts accusing the “Biden administration” of “corruption” in vaccine distribution are part of a Russian influence campaign:
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.02K Reposts · 4.49K Likes
49. Often intelligence came in the form of brief reports, followed by long lists of accounts simply deemed to be pro-Maduro, pro-Cuba, pro-Russia, etc. This one batch had over 1000 accounts marked for digital execution:
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
926 Reposts · 4.22K Likes
50. One report says a site “documenting purported rights abuses committed by Ukrainians” is directed by Russian agents:
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
836 Reposts · 4.14K Likes
51. Intel about the shady origin of these accounts might be true. But so might at least some of the information in them – about neo-Nazis, rights abuses in Donbas, even about our own government. Should we block such material?
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
818 Reposts · 4.57K Likes
52. This is a difficult speech dilemma. Should the government be allowed to try to prevent Americans (and others) from seeing pro-Maduro or anti-Ukrainian accounts?
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
848 Reposts · 4.84K Likes
53. Often intel reports are just long lists of newspapers, tweets or YouTube videos guilty of “anti-Ukraine narratives”:
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
978 Reposts · 4.5K Likes
54. Sometimes - not always -Twitter and YouTube blocked the accounts. But now we know for sure what Roth meant by “the Bureau (and by extension the IC).”
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
849 Reposts · 4.43K Likes
55. The line between “misinformation” and “distorting propaganda” is thin. Are we comfortable with so many companies receiving so many reports from a “more aggressive” government?
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.04K Reposts · 5.32K Likes
56.The CIA has yet to comment on the nature of its relationship to tech companies like Twitter. Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by third parties, so what I saw could be limited.
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.05K Reposts · 5.93K Likes
Watch , , , and this space for more, on issues ranging from Covid-19 to Twitter's relationship to congress, and more.
5:21 PM · Dec 24, 2022
1.34K Reposts · 6.93K Likes
The more things change, the more they stay the same. The only solution is taking platforms out of the moderation game. The content-layer of the internet should be moved to neutral protocols.
*You* should be the one who decides what you can read. Not a company. Not a government.
16.The government was in constant contact not just with Twitter but with virtually every major tech firm.
7:49 PM · Dec 24, 2022
3.82K Reposts · 14.8K Likes
Note on Left and Right in the Twitter Files…
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
356 Reposts · 1.44K Likes
Mainstream outlets try to grind every news story into grade D partisan hamburger and Twitter Files coverage is no exception. The Washington Post even called me a “conservative journalist” for a few minutes.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
159 Reposts · 1.01K Likes
This isn’t a left or right project. The question that interests me, how these companies have been absorbed as intelligence arms, is more future/dystopia than blue/red. But that story is hard to sell, se we’re getting the usual stupidity.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
284 Reposts · 1.47K Likes
Still, well-meaning people have questions:
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
62 Reposts · 745 Likes
Obviously, I know voices on the left have been “moderated” a lot, because I’ve been interviewing them for years:
taibbi.substack.com
Meet the Censored: Olivia Katbi-Smith
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
70 Reposts · 620 Likes
But we’re all trying to triage time and instead of looking up individual accounts, most of us have been looking at broader search terms to start, like “FBI,” “Covid,” “DHS,” etc.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
78 Reposts · 648 Likes
I did look up account(s) connected to Julian Assange. His “PV2” page doesn’t show anything unusual, just automated suspensions of an abandoned account, and I found no record of, say, a government-initiated action.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
88 Reposts · 590 Likes
That doesn’t mean such intervention doesn’t exist. It may be in a Slack or an email somewhere. It’s a big haystack. We’ll keep looking.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
81 Reposts · 769 Likes
A few actions hit both Republicans and Democrats. Some FBI offices were clearly running searches of “November 4” to catch people trying to trick others into not voting, and this snared both Biden and Trump voters in silly numbers.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
53 Reposts · 321 Likes
There are interesting/ambiguous details, like a decision we found in which the company considered restricting all moderation decisions involving Biden or Trump to four senior executives:
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
56 Reposts · 307 Likes
But Twitter did have a clear political monoculture. I ran searches for both “RNC” and “DNC,” cross-referenced against senior executives. “RNC” turned up pages about Republicans suing the company. “DNC” returned mountains of insistent moderation demands.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
97 Reposts · 407 Likes
Some of the latter were quite funny and revealing.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
35 Reposts · 331 Likes
In multiple instances Twitter initially decided not to remove videos lampooning Joe Biden because they were obvious parodies “unlikely to cause offline harm or generate confusion.”
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
52 Reposts · 419 Likes
These included a "deceptively edited" video of Biden coughing:
And a "Todos Con Biden" Trumo spoof:
youtube.com
Joe Biden’s ‘Todos con Biden’ event was off the rails!
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
48 Reposts · 362 Likes
Usually Twitter was responding to complaints from one very voluble DNC staffer and still applied warning labels to such content. In one case, they refused to do either.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
60 Reposts · 429 Likes
“Because the video is an unaltered excerpt of the Vice President's speech, our teams consider it to be out of context, but not deceptive,” Twitter told the staffer, who fumed, "These rules need revision."
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
63 Reposts · 487 Likes
In the process, they sent a graph of their bizarre moderation flow chart, which among other things showed they can still apply labels to non-deceptive material. This seemed more interesting than the fate of a Biden coughing mashup.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
108 Reposts · 548 Likes
If this kind of mechanized speech control can be used one way today, it can be used in another tomorrow, especially if unseen enforcment officials are pushing on the levers.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
174 Reposts · 1.17K Likes
People will try to make this story about who did and did not benefit and argue this endlessly. But the utility of the project is showing everyone how the machine worked - which we're trying to do.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
162 Reposts · 1.23K Likes
In the process, they sent a graph of their bizarre moderation flow chart, which among other things showed they can still apply labels to non-deceptive material. This seemed more interesting than the fate of a Biden coughing mashup.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
103 Reposts · 506 Likes
If this kind of mechanized speech control can be used one way today, it can be used in another tomorrow, especially if unseen enforcment officials are pushing on the levers.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
165 Reposts · 1.1K Likes
“Because the video is an unaltered excerpt of the Vice President's speech, our teams consider it to be out of context, but not deceptive,” Twitter told the staffer, who fumed, "These rules need revision."
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
58 Reposts · 452 Likes
In the process, they sent a graph of their bizarre moderation flow chart, which among other things showed they can still apply labels to non-deceptive material. This seemed more interesting than the fate of a Biden coughing mashup.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
103 Reposts · 523 Likes
If this kind of mechanized speech control can be used one way today, it can be used in another tomorrow, especially if unseen enforcment officials are pushing on the levers.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
170 Reposts · 1.12K Likes
People will try to make this story about who did and did not benefit and argue this endlessly. But the utility of the project is showing everyone how the machine worked - which we're trying to do.
8:29 PM · Dec 24, 2022
600 Reposts · 4.03K Likes
Congressman, why is a “Foreign Influence” task force sending Excel spreadsheets full of joke tweets from low-follower accounts in Maryland, Kentucky, and Ohio? Why does the FITF spend so much time reviewing domestic speech?
.@elonmusk @mtaibbi @ShellenbergerMD are gaslighting you with their misleading “Twitter Files” posts. Here’s the truth:
1. FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force does threat indicator sharing with companies. That’s a good thing.
2. Companies decide what to do with that information. https://t.co/SDFog58rzO
9:47 PM · Dec 24, 2022
2.28K Reposts · 9.58K Likes
Here a top Twitter staffer admitted the government’s “aggressive” demands for validation of foreign influence theories could no longer be resisted: “Our window” on independence is closing, he said.
40. “Due to a lack of technical evidence on our end, I've generally left it be, waiting for more evidence,” he says. “Our window on that is closing, given that government partners are becoming more aggressive on attribution.” https://t.co/IZLaxEF6lY
11:55 PM · Dec 24, 2022
887 Reposts · 2.95K Likes
It was so obvious the FBI was assigning personnel specifically to look for Twitter term-of-service violations — an effort funded by taxes, instead of fighting crime — that two of the company’s top lawyers wondered what the hell was going on:
27.“They have some folks in the Baltimore field office and at HQ that are just doing keyword searches for violations. This is probably the 10th request I have dealt with in the last 5 days,” remarked Cardille. https://t.co/asTlMhs2if
12:14 AM · Dec 25, 2022
1.4K Reposts · 4.89K Likes
Twitter Files Thread: The Spies Who Loved Twitter:
open.substack.com
Twitter Files Thread: The Spies Who Loved Twitter
6:26 AM · Dec 25, 2022
21.1K Reposts · 76.1K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
1/ The FBI buried the since 2019.
What's on it?
Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill that sent millions of people to prison for doing what his son is doing here.
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
10K Reposts · 18.1K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
2/ After a 13-month investigation, the report fully documents 459 violations of state and federal laws found on the .
It includes 140 business-related crimes, 191 sex-related offenses, and 128 drug-related crimes.
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
1.43K Reposts · 3.08K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
3/ The Biden family made more than $30 million from officials linked to Chinese intelligence.
Hunter, Jimmy, and Sara Biden partnered with the "spy chief of China" (Hunter's words) and CEFC Energy to spread China's Belt & Road initiative.
Joe knew everything.
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
1.1K Reposts · 2.49K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
4/ Xi Jinping personally approved the Biden family's meetings with CEFC Chairman Ye Jianming.
kanekoa.substack.com
Marco Polo Report reveals Xi Jinping personally approved Bidens’ meetings with Chinese energy tycoon
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
771 Reposts · 1.95K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
5/ Hunter sent a text to Hallie Biden saying that he was involved in "brokering a deal with Vladimir Putin," and China had arrested "CIA operatives" in retaliation for the DOJ arresting his "client the chief of intelligence of China."
kanekoa.substack.com
EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden’s Most Treasonous Text Message
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
977 Reposts · 2.21K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
6/ If you are a Biden, you can collect $30 million from the Chinese government, work with the "spy chief of China," broker a $9 billion oil & gas deal for Vladimir Putin, and the FBI will work with big tech companies to conceal your family's crimes.
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
1.48K Reposts · 3.58K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
7/ The Bidens made millions from Chinese oil, gas, and coal before Joe canceled American pipelines, banned drilling for oil & gas, and declared war on U.S. energy production.
kanekoa.substack.com
Joe Crushes American Energy While Hunter Gets Rich From Chinese Fossil Fuels
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
867 Reposts · 2.13K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
8/ The real story is that the Biden family was getting rich from business with our enemies, they were selling access to the US government, and Joe Biden was getting paid.
Hunter text messaged his daughter, saying, "unlike Pop, I won't make you give me half your salary."
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
841 Reposts · 2.11K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
9/ released a 630-page report with 2,020 citations that fully document 459 crimes committed by the Biden family & their business associates.
You can read it for free here.
bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org
Report on the Biden Laptop
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
987 Reposts · 2.12K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
10/ The FBI framed as a Russian agent, spied on him, and raided his home.
The DOJ and the corporate media will continue to persecute Trump's family while they cover up the containing substantial evidence of the Biden family's treasonous crimes.
9:20 PM · Dec 19, 2022
1.1K Reposts · 2.54K Likes
1. THREAD:
THE TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER RIGGED THE COVID DEBATE
– By censoring info that was true but inconvenient to U.S. govt. policy
– By discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed
– By suppressing ordinary users, including some sharing the CDC’s *own data*
2:10 PM · Dec 26, 2022
67.9K Reposts · 160K Likes
2. So far the Twitter Files have focused on evidence of Twitter’s secret blacklists; how the company functioned as a kind of subsidiary of the FBI; and how execs rewrote the platform’s rules to accommodate their own political desires.
2:14 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.86K Reposts · 41.5K Likes
3. What we have yet to cover is Covid. This reporting, for The Free Press, , is one piece of that important story.
2:16 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.8K Reposts · 34.8K Likes
4. The United States government pressured Twitter and other social media platforms to elevate certain content and suppress other content about Covid-19.
2:18 PM · Dec 26, 2022
8.95K Reposts · 42.6K Likes
5. Internal files at Twitter that I viewed while on assignment for showed that both the Trump and Biden administrations directly pressed Twitter executives to moderate the platform’s pandemic content according to their wishes.
2:21 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.29K Reposts · 34.8K Likes
6. At the onset of the pandemic, according to meeting notes, the Trump admin was especially concerned about panic buying. They came looking for “help from the tech companies to combat misinformation” about “runs on grocery stores.” But . . . there were runs on grocery stores.
2:23 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.66K Reposts · 29.4K Likes
7. It wasn’t just Twitter. The meetings with the Trump White House were also attended by Google, Facebook, Microsoft and others.
2:24 PM · Dec 26, 2022
5.25K Reposts · 29.7K Likes
8. When the Biden admin took over, one of their first meeting requests with Twitter executives was on Covid. The focus was on “anti-vaxxer accounts.” Especially Alex Berenson:
2:26 PM · Dec 26, 2022
7.89K Reposts · 35.8K Likes
9. In the summer of 2021, president Biden said social media companies were “killing people” for allowing vaccine misinformation. Berenson was suspended hours after Biden’s comments, and kicked off the platform the following month.
2:27 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.11K Reposts · 32.6K Likes
9. In the summer of 2021, president Biden said social media companies were “killing people” for allowing vaccine misinformation. Berenson was suspended hours after Biden’s comments, and kicked off the platform the following month.
2:27 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.11K Reposts · 32.6K Likes
10. Berenson sued (and then settled with) Twitter. In the legal process Twitter was compelled to release certain internal communications, which showed direct White House pressure on the company to take action on Berenson.
2:29 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.53K Reposts · 32.7K Likes
11. A December 2022 summary of meetings with the White House by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy, adds new evidence of the White House’s pressure campaign, and cements that it repeatedly attempted to directly influence the platform.
2:31 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.7K Reposts · 27.6K Likes
12. Culbertson wrote that the Biden team was “very angry” that Twitter had not been more aggressive in deplatforming multiple accounts. They wanted Twitter to do more.
2:32 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.41K Reposts · 30.4K Likes
13. Twitter executives did not fully capitulate to the Biden team’s wishes. An extensive review of internal communications at the company revealed employees often debating moderation cases in great detail, and with more care than was shown by the government toward free speech.
2:33 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.11K Reposts · 27.6K Likes
14. But Twitter did suppress views—many from doctors and scientific experts—that conflicted with the official positions of the White House. As a result, legitimate findings and questions that would have expanded the public debate went missing.
2:34 PM · Dec 26, 2022
8.98K Reposts · 38.1K Likes
15. There were three serious problems with Twitter’s process:
First, much of the content moderation was conducted by bots, trained on machine learning and AI – impressive in their engineering, yet still too crude for such nuanced work.
2:35 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.51K Reposts · 27.7K Likes
16. Second, contractors, in places like the Philippines, also moderated content. They were given decision trees to aid in the process, but tasking non experts to adjudicate tweets on complex topics like myocarditis and mask efficacy data was destined for a significant error rate
2:37 PM · Dec 26, 2022
5.48K Reposts · 29.6K Likes
17 Third, most importantly, the buck stopped with higher level employees at Twitter who chose the inputs for the bots and decision trees, and subjectively decided escalated cases and suspensions. As it is with all people and institutions, there was individual and collective bias
2:38 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.6K Reposts · 27.8K Likes
18. With Covid, this bias bent heavily toward establishment dogmas.
2:39 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.48K Reposts · 28.1K Likes
19. Inevitably, dissident yet legitimate content was labeled as misinformation, and the accounts of doctors and others were suspended both for tweeting opinions and demonstrably true information.
2:41 PM · Dec 26, 2022
7.51K Reposts · 33.3K Likes
20. Exhibit A: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School, tweeted views at odds with US public health authorities and the American left, the political affiliation of nearly the entire staff at Twitter.
2:42 PM · Dec 26, 2022
8.07K Reposts · 37K Likes
21. Internal emails show an “intent to action” by a moderator, saying Kulldorff’s tweet violated the company’s Covid-19 misinformation policy and claimed he shared “false information.”
2:43 PM · Dec 26, 2022
7.01K Reposts · 31.9K Likes
22. But Kulldorff’s statement was an expert’s opinion—one which also happened to be in line with vaccine policies in numerous other countries. Yet it was deemed “false information” by Twitter moderators merely because it differed from CDC guidelines.
2:44 PM · Dec 26, 2022
7.06K Reposts · 36.5K Likes
23. After Twitter took action, Kulldorff’s tweet was slapped with a “Misleading” label and all replies and likes were shut off, throttling the tweet’s ability to be seen and shared by many people, the ostensible core function of the platform:
2:45 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.09K Reposts · 31.1K Likes
24. In my review of internal files, I found countless instances of tweets labeled as “misleading” or taken down entirely, sometimes triggering account suspensions, simply because they veered from CDC guidance or differed from establishment views.
2:46 PM · Dec 26, 2022
5.3K Reposts · 28.8K Likes
25. A tweet by , a self-proclaimed public health fact checker, with 18K followers, was flagged as “Misleading,” and replies and likes disabled, even though it displayed the CDC’s *own data.*
2:47 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.89K Reposts · 32.5K Likes
26. Internal records showed that a bot had flagged the tweet, and that it received many “tattles” (what the system amusingly called reports from users). That triggered a manual review by a human who– despite the tweet showing actual CDC data–nevertheless labeled it “Misleading”
2:48 PM · Dec 26, 2022
4.47K Reposts · 27.1K Likes
27. Tellingly, the tweet by that was labeled “Misleading” was a reply to a tweet that contained actual misinformation.
Covid has never been the leading cause of death from disease in children. Yet that tweet remains on the platform, and without a “misleading” label.
2:50 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.77K Reposts · 31.6K Likes
28. Whether by humans or algorithms, content that was contrarian but true was still subject to getting flagged or suppressed
This tweet was labeled “Misleading,” even though the owner of this account, , a physician, was referring to the results of a published study
2:52 PM · Dec 26, 2022
7.13K Reposts · 31K Likes
29. Andrew Bostom, a Rhode Island physician, was permanently suspended from Twitter after receiving multiple strikes for misinformation. One of his strikes was for a tweet referring to the results from a peer reviewed study on mRNA vaccines.
2:53 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.79K Reposts · 30.7K Likes
30. A review of Twitter log files revealed that an internal audit, conducted after Bostom’s attorney contacted Twitter, found that only 1 of Bostom’s 5 violations were valid.
2:54 PM · Dec 26, 2022
3.68K Reposts · 23.4K Likes
31. The one Bostom tweet found to still be in violation cited data that was legitimate but inconvenient to the public health establishment’s narrative about the risks of flu versus Covid in children.
2:54 PM · Dec 26, 2022
6.22K Reposts · 29.8K Likes
32. That this tweet was not only flagged by a bot, but its violation manually affirmed by a staff member is telling of both the algorithmic and human bias at play. Bostom’s account was suspended for months and was finally restored on Christmas Day.
2:55 PM · Dec 26, 2022
2.64K Reposts · 15.9K Likes
33. Another example of human bias run amok was the reaction to this tweet by Trump. Many Trump tweets led to extensive internal debates, and this one was no different.
2:56 PM · Dec 26, 2022
3.26K Reposts · 16.8K Likes
34. In a surreal exchange, Jim Baker, at the time Twitter’s Deputy General Counsel, asks why telling people to not be afraid wasn’t a violation of Twitter’s Covid-19 misinformation policy.
2:57 PM · Dec 26, 2022
5.31K Reposts · 21.2K Likes
35. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of Trust & Safety, had to explain that optimism wasn’t misinformation.
2:58 PM · Dec 26, 2022
3.52K Reposts · 17.6K Likes
36. Remember with the CDC data tweet? Twitter’s response to her is clarifying: “we will prioritize review and labeling of content that could lead to increased exposure or transmission.”
3:00 PM · Dec 26, 2022
2.25K Reposts · 13.8K Likes
37. Twitter made a decision, via the political leanings of senior staff, and govt pressure, that the public health authorities’ approach to the pandemic – prioritizing mitigation over other concerns – was “The Science” . . .
3:01 PM · Dec 26, 2022
3.66K Reposts · 17.5K Likes
38. Information that challenged that view, such as showing harms of vaccines, or that could be perceived as downplaying the risks of Covid, especially to children, was subject to moderation, and even suppression. No matter whether such views were correct or adopted abroad.
3:02 PM · Dec 26, 2022
3.78K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
39. What might this pandemic and its aftermath have looked like if there had been a more open debate on Twitter and other social media platforms—not to mention the mainstream press—about the origins of Covid, about lockdowns, about the true risks of Covid in kids, and much more?
3:03 PM · Dec 26, 2022
5.47K Reposts · 25.4K Likes
40. Thanks to , , and the team for their help reporting this story.
3:04 PM · Dec 26, 2022
2.13K Reposts · 17.7K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
1/ THREAD🚨
slams CISA censorship network as 'propaganda platform.'
This DHS-backed censorship consortium used 120 analysts to censor millions of social media posts on elections and covid-19.
kanekoa.substack.com
Elon Musk slams CISA censorship network as ‘propaganda platform’
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
9.06K Reposts · 21.5K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
2/ The DHS outsourced censorship to the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), comprised of four organizations: Stanford Internet Observatory, the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.14K Reposts · 3.24K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
3/ On the 2020 election:
•120 analysts monitored 15 tech platforms
•22 Million tweets labeled “misinformation”
•Entire “misinformation narratives” targeted for platform-wide throttling
The EIP claimed every "repeat spreader of election misinformation" was on the right.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.27K Reposts · 3.51K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
4/ This Orwellian speech control network also flagged popular populist-right YouTube channels, including , , , and even the War Room, as “mis- and disinformation” spreaders.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.2K Reposts · 3.47K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
5/ The report comprehensively details the US government’s role in outsourcing censorship to this public-private network.
Founder extensively documented the individuals involved and the flow of taxpayer funds ($40M) to domestic censorship.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
864 Reposts · 2.83K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
6/ The DHS quietly corrupted CISA's mission when it designated domestic disinformation as cyber attacks on "critical cognitive infrastructure."
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
836 Reposts · 2.74K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
7/ But CISA had a First Amendment problem. The US government cannot sandblast millions of voters off the Internet because of their speech about elections.
CISA needed private sector partners to do dirty work. And that's where EIP stepped in:
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.09K Reposts · 3.11K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
8/ CISA "lacked the funding and the legal authorizations" to do grand-scale censorship and get away with it. So CISA partnered with EIP, who "filled the gap of the things the government could not do themselves."
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
823 Reposts · 2.65K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
9/ So, who are these unelected bureaucrats who get to play judge, jury, and executioner and control the thoughts of millions of Americans?
“The main character in the CISA side of this story is its then-director, Chris Krebs.”
foundationforfreedomonline.com
DHS Censorship Agency Had Strange First Mission: Banning Speech That Casts Doubt On ‘Red Mirage, Blue Shift’ Election Events
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
947 Reposts · 2.78K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
10/ Chris Krebs political bias and his affinity for domestic censorship:
•Called Trump a national security threat
•Pleased with censorship
•Passionately censored covid-19 and elections
•Wanted lawyers and doctors disbarred
•Wanted conservative media bankrupted
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.18K Reposts · 3.15K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
11/ Alex Stamos, a former Facebook exec, is the founder of the EIP censorship network and Krebs' business partner.
Stamos is a member of the CFR, a member of the Aspen Institute, the director of the Stanford Internet Observatory, and he loves censoring his political opponents.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
913 Reposts · 2.74K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
12/ In Jan. 2021, Alex Stamos compared “over half of the Republicans in Congress” to ISIS.
He called on Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast to block OANN and Newsmax and said:
“We have to turn down the capability of these conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.”
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.07K Reposts · 2.86K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
13/ Kate Starbird is the head of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public director and CISA’s “disinformation” advisor subcommittee.
US government grants have funded her work on domestic censorship since 2013.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
816 Reposts · 2.53K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
14/ The EIP's Starbird used advanced monitoring AI to map out entire networks of people who spread a narrative.
This allowed the EIP to stalk every chain in what they deemed a "false narrative" and to systematically censor entire belief systems at scale:
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
871 Reposts · 2.61K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
15/ In October 2018, Starbird told her Facebook followers to vote Democrat to hold Trump responsible for "corruption and collusion" and his "racist, anti-LGBT agenda."
Starbird claimed Trump's “nationalism” didn’t stand for “patriotism” but instead stood for “white supremacy."
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
760 Reposts · 2.46K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
16/ Kate Starbird heads CISA's disinformation advisory panel with Vijaya Gadde, the recently fired top lawyer at Twitter, who famously banned the former President and opposed proposal to roll back Twitter censorship policies.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
955 Reposts · 2.75K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
17/ Graham Brookie is the figure who led the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab and a previous Obama White House National Security Council member.
The Atlantic Council is a NATO think-tank with seven living CIA directors as members.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
713 Reposts · 2.33K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
18/ Brookie, a government-funded disinformation expert, dedicated much of his time during President Trump’s years in the White House to promoting the false narrative that the President of the United States was a Russian agent controlled by Vladimir Putin.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
768 Reposts · 2.43K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
19/ In Oct. 2020, Brookie would call the “laundered unverified misinfo.”
When DNI John Ratcliffe stated that the laptop was legitimate, Brookie publicly condemned Ratcliffe’s “credibility” and accused him of “politicizing intel.”
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
851 Reposts · 2.68K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
20/ Incredibly, the Atlantic Council's disinfo lab tasked by the DHS to censor the 2020 election tweeted its director's disdain for the President days before the election.
"Trump is hands down the most significant accelerant and amplifier for disinformation in the election."
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
651 Reposts · 2.29K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
21/ Ben Nimmo, a Facebook exec, leads the censorship role at Graphika and is a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council’s DFR Lab.
He was a NATO press officer and was briefly listed as a senior fellow at the UK Institute for Statecraft.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
634 Reposts · 2.18K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
22/ “Donald Trump is right that someone is trying to rig the US election, but it is not Hillary Clinton: it is the Kremlin, and Trump is an accomplice, whether or not he realizes it,” Nimmo lamented in 2016.
The Pentagon awarded Graphika $5 million in 2021 for more censorship.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
658 Reposts · 2.28K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
23/ In June 2019, at an Atlantic Council conference, Nimmo trained journalists on how to spot “disinformation” in Trump tweets and Brexit ads.
Senior journalists were encouraged to hold up placards reading “Bullsh*t” to Trump tweets and Brexit slogans:
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
634 Reposts · 2.18K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
24/ The EIP defined "delegitimization" as speech that “casts doubt” on the election process or outcome.
This accounted for 72% of the censorship tickets and targeted over 99% of the post throttled by narrative, focusing on voting machines and vote-by-mail.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
988 Reposts · 2.92K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
25/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.
10:39 PM · Dec 28, 2022
3.54K Reposts · 6.95K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
26/ The EIP collaborated with its Big Tech partners to systematically censor any delegitimization of vote-by-mail as disinformation.
In effect, they sided with the left and pre-banned criticism of vote-by-mail at the narrative level five months before the 2020 election.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
839 Reposts · 2.54K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
27/ The political establishment and the left used the covid-19 crisis to push for nationwide mail-in voting, which increased the number of ballots cast by mail from 28.8 million in 2016 to 66.4 million in 2020, a massive 131% increase.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.04K Reposts · 2.99K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
28/ The percentage of Democrats voting by mail rose from 26% in 2016 to 60% in 2020, while Republican voters only saw a rise from 21% to 32%.
In short, the extra 37 million ballots cast by mail during the 2020 election swung the election to the EIP's preferred candidate.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.42K Reposts · 4.14K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
29/ In Europe, 74% of nations ban mail-in ballots for citizens living inside their country.
Brazil, Russia, Israel, Mexico, and a host of additional developed nations have also banned mail-in voting due to security concerns.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
1.29K Reposts · 3.62K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
30/ In 2012, the NYT wrote, "all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots."
In 2016, Slate wrote, "the only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots."
slate.com
Why Republicans Aren’t Actually Interested in Stopping Voter Fraud
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
893 Reposts · 2.64K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
31/ Regardless of your opinion on voting machines or mail-in voting, it’s clear that this public-private censorship network conspired with big tech & big government to censor one side of the discussion.
In Feb. 2021, the EIP expanded its focus to censor covid-19 disinformation.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
675 Reposts · 2.21K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
32/ The DHS-backed censorship network launched the Virality Project, a collaboration between the EIP and the National Conference on Citizenship’s Algorithmic Transparency Institute, New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics, and Tandon School of Engineering.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
326 Reposts · 1.13K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
33/ The censorship consortium monitored “keyword-based queries and cluster-based community lists of key public figures and influencers” on all of the Big Tech platforms and mass-censored entire narratives that questioned the safety, efficacy, and necessity of the mRNA vaccines.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
421 Reposts · 1.25K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
34/ Maddie de Garay, a 12-year-old girl in the Pfizer vaccine trial, went from healthy to paralyzed 12 hours after her second dose.
Pfizer labeled it "abdominal pain."
The VP said, "The claim that the daughter was harmed by the vaccine has not been proven."
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
948 Reposts · 1.91K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
35/ The Virality Project:
“The idea that natural immunity from infection is superior to immunity from vaccination became a political talking point raised repeatedly by right-leaning political influencers, despite inconclusive scientific evidence.”
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
311 Reposts · 1.16K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
36/ The DHS-censorship network claims that there are no warning signs in regard to the safety of these mRNA vaccines in VAERS, the UK’s Yellow Card reporting site, EudraVigilance (used in the European Economic Area), and the World Health Organization’s VigiAccess.
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
346 Reposts · 1.14K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
37/ This authoritarian censorship network that operates in a constellation of NATO, DHS, and State Department-funded NGOs cannot be allowed to censor inconvenient truths, facts, & narratives under the guise of protecting the public from "misinformation."
kanekoa.substack.com
Elon Musk slams CISA censorship network as ‘propaganda platform’
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
587 Reposts · 2.04K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
38/ Earlier this month, the head of the EIP, , asked for “transparency” regarding the Tesla CEO tweeting, “the rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left.”
Musk responded to the CISA censorship czar, “You operate a propaganda platform.”
11:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022
748 Reposts · 2.73K Likes
Belated ATW podcast with my patient friend on the Twitter Files, Shirley Jackson, the Truman Show come to life, and more:
open.substack.com
Episode 18: “America This Week,” with Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn
9:59 PM · Dec 27, 2022
515 Reposts · 2.57K Likes
The FBI, explaining to Twitter they'll handle info from the "USIC," while the DHS agency CISA will send domestic reports:
"We can give you everything we're seeing from the FBI and USIC agencies. CISA will know what is going on in each state."
More soon
7:57 PM · Dec 29, 2022
3.58K Reposts · 11.9K Likes
Which U.S. agency had a "mandate for offensive IO to promote American interests," according to Twitter executives?
Check here tomorrow. Apologies for the delay
8:01 PM · Dec 29, 2022
1.98K Reposts · 9.97K Likes
IO is indeed “information operations.”
10:55 PM · Dec 29, 2022
212 Reposts · 1.81K Likes
2022: Year of the Great Nevermind, America This Week, New Year edition, with :
open.substack.com
Episode 19: “America This Week,” with Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn
1:44 AM · Dec 31, 2022
461 Reposts · 2.38K Likes
Twitter Files: Why Twitter Let the Intelligence Community In
A deeper dive, on TK:
open.substack.com
Twitter Files: Why Twitter Let the Intelligence Community In
8:52 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.21K Reposts · 3.65K Likes
1.THREAD: The Twitter Files
Twitter and the FBI “Belly Button”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
7.09K Reposts · 15.4K Likes
2020, Twitter was struggling with the problem of public and private agencies bypassing them and going straight to the media with lists of suspect accounts.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
901 Reposts · 4.87K Likes
February, 2020, as COVID broke out, the Global Engagement Center – a fledgling analytic/intelligence arms of the State Department – went to the media with a report called, “Russian Disinformation Apparatus Taking Advantage of Coronavirus Concerns.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.02K Reposts · 4.75K Likes
4.The GEC flagged accounts as “Russian personas and proxies” based on criteria like, “Describing the Coronavirus as an engineered bioweapon,” blaming “research conducted at the Wuhan institute,” and “attributing the appearance of the virus to the CIA.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.32K Reposts · 5.28K Likes
5.State also flagged accounts that retweeted news that Twitter banned the popular U.S. ZeroHedge, claiming the episode “led to another flurry of disinformation narratives.” ZH had done reports speculating that the virus had lab origin.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.23K Reposts · 5.26K Likes
6.The GEC still led directly to news stories like the AFP’s headline, “Russia-linked disinformation campaign led to coronavirus alarm, US says,” and a Politico story about how “Russian, Chinese, Iranian Disinformation Narratives Echo One Another.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
824 Reposts · 4.4K Likes
7.“YOU HAVEN’T MADE A RUSSIA ATTRIBUTION IN SOME TIME” When Clemson’s Media Forensics Hub complained Twitter hadn’t “made a Russia attribution” in some time, Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth said it was “revelatory of their motives.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
959 Reposts · 4.56K Likes
8.“WE’RE HAPPY TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH YOU ON THIS, INSTEAD OF NBC.” Roth tried in vain to convince outsider researchers like the Clemson lab to check with them before pushing stories about foreign interference to media.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
938 Reposts · 4.54K Likes
9.Twitter was also trying to reduce the number of agencies with access to Roth. “If these folks are like House Homeland Committee and DHS, once we give them a direct contact with Yoel, they will want to come back to him again and again,” said policy director Carlos Monje.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
823 Reposts · 4.28K Likes
10.When the State Department/GEC – remember this was 2020, during the Trump administration – wanted to publicize a list of 5,500 accounts it claimed would “amplify Chinese propaganda and disinformation” about COVID, Twitter analysts were beside themselves.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
846 Reposts · 4.4K Likes
11.The GEC report appeared based on DHS data circulated earlier that week, and included accounts that followed “two or more” Chinese diplomatic accounts. They reportedly ended up with a list “nearly 250,000” names long, and included Canadian officials and a CNN account:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.15K Reposts · 5.16K Likes
12.Roth saw GEC’s move as an attempt by the GEC to use intel from other agencies to “insert themselves” into the content moderation club that included Twitter, Facebook, the FBI, DHS, and others:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
687 Reposts · 3.29K Likes
13.The GEC was soon agreeing to loop in Twitter before going public, but they were using a technique that had boxed in Twitter before. “The delta between when they share material and when they go to the press continues to be problematic,” wrote one comms official.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
583 Reposts · 3.08K Likes
14.The episode led to a rare public disagreement between Twitter and state officials:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
575 Reposts · 3.07K Likes
15.“IT MAKES SENSE TO PUSH BACK ON GEC PARTICIPATION IN THIS FORUM” When the FBI informed Twitter the GEC wanted to be included in the regular “industry call” between companies like Twitter and Facebook and the DHS and FBI, Twitter leaders balked at first.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
573 Reposts · 3.03K Likes
16.Facebook, Google, and Twitter executives were united in opposition to GEC’s inclusion, with ostensible reasons including, “The GEC’s mandate for offensive IO to promote American interests.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
658 Reposts · 3.17K Likes
17.A deeper reason was a perception that unlike the DHS and FBI, which were “apolitical,” as Roth put it, the GEC was “political,” which in Twitter-ese appeared to be partisan code.
“I think they thought the FBI was less Trumpy,” is how one former DOD official put it.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
700 Reposts · 3.12K Likes
18.After spending years rolling over for Democratic Party requests for “action” on “Russia-linked” accounts, Twitter was suddenly playing tough. Why? Because, as Roth put it, it would pose “major risks” to bring the GEC in, “especially as the election heats up.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
675 Reposts · 3.17K Likes
19.When senior lawyer Stacia Cardille tried to argue against the GEC’s inclusion to the FBI, the words resonated “with Elvis, not Laura,” i.e. with agent Elvis Chan, not Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) unit chief Laura Dehmlow:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
554 Reposts · 2.9K Likes
20.Eventually the FBI argued, first to Facebook, for a compromise solution: other USG agencies could participate in the “industry” calls, but the FBI and DHS would act as sole “conduits.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
600 Reposts · 2.92K Likes
21.Roth reached out to Chan with concerns about letting the “press-happy” GEC in, expressing hope they could keep the “circle of trust small.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
560 Reposts · 2.89K Likes
22."STATE... NSA, and CIA" Chan reassured him it would be a “one-way” channel, and “State/GEC, NSA, and CIA have expressed interest in being allowed on in listen mode only.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
669 Reposts · 2.97K Likes
23."BELLY BUTTON" “We can give you everything we’re seeing from the FBI and USIC agencies,” Chan explained, but the DHS agency CISA “will know what’s going on in each state.” He went on to ask if industry could “rely on the FBI to be the belly button of the USG."
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
736 Reposts · 3.09K Likes
24.They eventually settled on an industry call via Signal. In an impressive display of operational security, Chan circulated private numbers of each company’s chief moderation officer in a Word Doc marked “Signal Phone Numbers,” subject-lined, “List of Numbers.”
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
678 Reposts · 3.22K Likes
25.Twitter was taking requests from every conceivable government body, beginning with the Senate Intel Committee (SSCI), which seemed to need reassurance Twitter was taking FBI direction. Execs rushed to tell “Team SSCI” they zapped five accounts on an FBI tip:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
950 Reposts · 3.35K Likes
26.Requests arrived and were escalated from all over: from Treasury, the NSA, virtually every state, the HHS, from the FBI and DHS, and more:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
876 Reposts · 3.33K Likes
27.They also received an astonishing variety of requests from officials asking for individuals they didn’t like to be banned. Here, the office for Democrat and House Intel Committee chief Adam Schiff asks Twitter to ban journalist Paul Sperry:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
3.93K Reposts · 10.5K Likes
28.“WE DON’T DO THIS” Even Twitter declined to honor Schiff’s request at the time. Sperry was later suspended, however.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.07K Reposts · 3.82K Likes
29.Twitter honored almost everyone else’s requests, even those from GEC – including a decision to ban accounts like and because GEC identified them as “GRU-controlled” and linked “to the Russian government,” respectively:
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
652 Reposts · 2.88K Likes
30.The GEC requests were what a former CIA staffer working at Twitter was referring to, when he said, “Our window on that is closing,” meaning they days when Twitter could say no to serious requests were over.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
635 Reposts · 2.83K Likes
31.Remember the 2017 “internal guidance” in which Twitter decided to remove any user “identified by the U.S. intelligence community” as a state-sponsored entity committing cyber operations? By 2020 such identifications came in bulk.
9:54 PM · Jan 3, 2023
690 Reposts · 2.88K Likes
Watching some of the most famous, most powerful and richest men red-pill themselves into disaster. Pretty wild!
10:34 PM · Dec 2, 2022
1.25K Reposts · 18.6K Likes
Ben Collins @oneunderscore__
Imagine throwing it all away to do PR work for the richest person in the world. Humiliating shit.
11:53 PM · Dec 2, 2022
2.23K Reposts · 33.1K Likes
Matt Taibbi...what sad, disgraceful downfall. I swear, kids, he did good work back in the day. Should be a cautionary tale for everyone. Selling your soul for the richest white nationalist on Earth. Well, he'll eat well for the rest of his life I guess. But is it worth it?
11:58 PM · Dec 2, 2022
3.23K Reposts · 27.7K Likes
Matt Taibbi always was, and still remains, a fraud. Doing PR for the richest person in the world should come as no surprise.
12:00 AM · Dec 3, 2022
569 Reposts · 4.16K Likes
One minute you're scourging Goldman Sachs, the next you're doing PR for the richest man in the world, funny old life
12:01 AM · Dec 3, 2022
75 Reposts · 783 Likes
Eric Newcomer @EricNewcomer
Taibbi now doing comms for the world’s richest man on his own platform
Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm
12:21 AM · Dec 3, 2022
1 Repost · 18 Likes
Thats my read, too -- that the appropriate policy people made a call without government interference and were later overturned on appeal.
More curious about the process now... A journalist agrees to terms they refuse to describe to do social media PR for the richest man alive??
12:28 AM · Dec 3, 2022
5 Reposts · 25 Likes
Jason Schreier @jasonschreier
Editors are great not just because they make your work sharper, but because you can ask them things like "Hey should I be doing PR work for the richest man on the planet" and they'll say "Nah"
12:29 AM · Dec 3, 2022
184 Reposts · 2.62K Likes
Kind of a bummer to see the guy who made a meal out of Goldman Sachs dancing for the world’s richest man on a Friday night.
12:30 AM · Dec 3, 2022
20 Reposts · 137 Likes
Imagine volunteering to do online PR work for the world's richest man on a Friday night, in service of nakedly and cynically right-wing narratives, and then pretending you're speaking truth to power.
1:16 AM · Dec 3, 2022
1.55K Reposts · 12.8K Likes
Tyler Kingkade @tylerkingkade
Taibbi became prominent by writing columns in Rolling Stone about Wall Street greed, and now he’s doing an errand for the world’s richest man
1:50 AM · Dec 3, 2022
1 Repost · 12 Likes
Taibbi is a hack carrying water for a billionaire but I don’t think he’s a hack carrying water for the richest man in the world at this point. Not after blowing $44 billion on Twitter and with Tesla stock down by over 50% in the past year.
2:04 AM · Dec 3, 2022
18 Reposts · 118 Likes
“jOuRnaLiSm iS aBoUt SpEaKiNg tRuTh to pOwEr,” i, a supposedly serious journalist, say as i write up a press release for one of the richest people in the world on a site that they own and are desperate to drive traffic to
2:50 AM · Dec 3, 2022
76 Reposts · 464 Likes
I don’t really expect the world’s richest man to have even a passing familiarity with what the First Amendment does and doesn’t mean.
knows *exactly* what it does and doesn’t mean, and he carries water for anyway. Despicable.
3:37 AM · Dec 3, 2022
14 Reposts · 42 Likes
The Taibbi thread is a great example of overwriting when you don’t have the goods but you don’t want to admit you’re just doing pr for the world’s richest person
3:58 AM · Dec 3, 2022
270 Reposts · 2.28K Likes
From calling Goldman Sachs a “vampire squid” to giving free PR to the world’s richest billionaire. Man, what a career journey
4:10 AM · Dec 3, 2022
11 Reposts · 42 Likes
The Taibbi thing is so depressing. I was a defender well into his semi-recent heel turn, but to see a once-great journalist turn into a pathetic lap dog for the world's richest man is too much.
4:40 AM · Dec 3, 2022
3 Reposts · 44 Likes
Presumably Taibbi was the most credible guy the world's richest man could get to do this, which speaks to its Brobdingnagian bullshit level.
Here's a summary of the Taibbi thread for those who don't want to wade through it:
- Both Dems and GOPs asked twitter to delete certain tweets, and twitter sometimes obliged.
4:54 AM · Dec 3, 2022
85 Reposts · 363 Likes
Sturgeon's Law @Sturgeons_Law
Making a deal to do PR for the richest man in the world in exchange for exposure while advocating some kind of vague centrism is a fitting bookend to his past few years.
matt taibbi is an omen of how anti-communism coupled with nondescript anti-establishment/anti-elitist sentiments leads to goofy shit, like poorly constructed twitter threads masquerading as bombshell reporting when its all really just about the presidents sons dick
5:09 AM · Dec 3, 2022
16 Reposts · 410 Likes
Zach D Roberts - Photojournalist for hire @zdroberts
Going from Rolling Stone magazine writing about corporate corruption and power to tweeting a political hit job assigned by the richest man in the world is a wild fucking ride that all the drugs in Hunter Thompson trunk could cause. This is all Taibbi.
6:54 AM · Dec 3, 2022
17 Reposts · 55 Likes
Ross McCafferty @RossMcCaff
He didn't *get* the story. It was handed to him so he could do PR for the world's richest man
12:06 PM · Dec 3, 2022
14 Reposts · 242 Likes
Watching Matt's unbelievable fall into lazy, reactionary commentator and now pr hand for the world's richest man is depressing.
Justin Baragona @justinbaragona
On his Substack, Matt Taibbi tells his readers that he "had to agree to certain conditions" to do the Hunter Biden laptop thread for Musk. https://t.co/49i58VbIIX
1:53 PM · Dec 3, 2022
11 Reposts · 70 Likes
Congrats on your new career as document repository for the world’s richest blowhard
3:09 PM · Dec 3, 2022
7 Reposts · 128 Likes
Sarah Reese Jones @PoliticusSarah
We don’t perform as a PR person to the richest man on the planet, but we do center how policy impacts The People over billionaires.
100% independent, no PAC $, no corporate funds.
Check our our new newsletter launched Nov 6 ish, which is already a best seller👇🏼
Sarah Reese Jones @PoliticusSarah
Nazi-free Follow Me:
Mastodon@PoliticusSarah@journa.host
Post: @PoliticusSarah
CounterSocial: @politicusSarah
Free newsletter & pod: https://t.co/Vz0KFKZLyu
4:53 PM · Dec 3, 2022
13 Reposts · 37 Likes
The biggest question to answer involves your journalistic integrity. Honest reporters reveal any conflicts of interest beyond just writing "I had to agree to certain conditions," presumably with the world's richest man who's pushing a far-right political agenda.
It's been a whirlwind 96 hours for me, too. There is much more to come, including answers to questions about issues like shadow-banning, boosting, follower counts, the fate of various individual accounts, and more. These issues are not limited to the political right.
5:02 PM · Dec 3, 2022
19 Reposts · 79 Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
1/ THREAD🚨
Pfizer has habitually engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribed physicians, & suppressed adverse trial results.
This is no secret, yet this fact continues to be brushed under the rug by politicians & the media.
kanekoa.substack.com
Pfizer’s History of Fraud, Corruption, and Using Nigerian Children as ‘Human Guinea Pigs’
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
18.5K Reposts · 33.3K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
2/ Pfizer’s CEO claimed during a November 2021 interview that a group of “medical professionals” intentionally circulating “misinformation” critical of the Pfizer vaccine were “criminals.”
The Pfizer CEO must have forgotten the history of his own company.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.46K Reposts · 4.67K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
3/ In 1994, Pfizer paid the Justice Department to settle claims that the company lied to get federal approval for a heart valve and then covered up safety concerns even as the device killed hundreds of patients.
Pfizer paid $200M to settle lawsuits.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.47K Reposts · 4.19K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
4/ In 1996, Pfizer gave an experimental drug to 200 Nigerian children without informing their parents that an approved cure existed or that their children were subjects of a medical experiment.
Eleven children died.
Others suffered brain damage, organ failure, or paralysis.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
3.01K Reposts · 5.69K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
5/ In 2001, Pfizer was sued on behalf of 30 Nigerian families who alleged their "children were used as human guinea pigs."
The families claimed Pfizer violated the Nuremberg Code and exposed their children to "cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment."
The case was dismissed.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.51K Reposts · 4.05K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
6/ In 2007, the Nigerian government sued Pfizer for $7 billion and accused the company of "carrying out illegal trials" that "killed or disabled children."
Nigeria claimed Pfizer did not inform local health authorities or parents that the children were part of an experiment.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.56K Reposts · 4.07K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
7/ It gets even worse.
In 2010, leaked State Department cables alleged that Pfizer had hired investigators to blackmail Nigeria's Attorney General into dropping the $7 billion lawsuit against Pfizer.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.55K Reposts · 3.93K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
8/ The leaked cables claimed Pfizer passed "a series of damaging articles" to the media that accused the Attorney General of corruption and warned him that more negative articles would come out if he didn't drop the case.
Nigeria dropped the case in 2009.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.25K Reposts · 3.58K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
9/ In 2002, Pfizer agreed to pay $49 million to settle allegations that the drug company defrauded the federal government and 40 states by charging too much for its cholesterol treatment Lipitor.
Pfizer's revenue for Lipitor in 2001 was $6.45 billion.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.12K Reposts · 3.34K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
10/ In 2008, the NYT published an article entitled, “Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies.”
Pfizer delayed the publication of negative studies, spun negative data more positively, and suppressed negative findings to promote Neurontin.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.34K Reposts · 3.56K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
11/ Dr. Kay Dickersin, a John Hopkins Professor of Medicine, who reviewed the Pfizer studies, concluded that 80% of the positive studies were published in full journal articles.
Yet, only 38% of negative studies were published, and some only partially.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
899 Reposts · 2.97K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
12/ In 2009, Pfizer paid $750M to settle 35,000 claims that its drug, Rezulin, was responsible for 63 deaths and dozens of liver failures.
The FDA did not remove Rezulin from the market until three years after the UK had, despite a mounting death toll.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.08K Reposts · 3.04K Likes
There seems to be no tweet numbered 13.
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
14/ In 2009, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion, then the largest healthcare fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the US.
Pfizer pled guilty to paying kickbacks to doctors and illegally promoting — Bextra, Geodon, Zyvox, and Lyrica.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.27K Reposts · 3.35K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
15/ CNN's Anderson Cooper: If Pfizer is too big to fail and even the biggest fine in history is just a few months' profits, then what's going to stop it from illegally promoting other drugs?
Critics say nothing.
They say it's the cost of doing business.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.19K Reposts · 3.5K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
16/ In 2010, Pfizer was ordered to pay $142 million in damages for violating federal anti-racketeering laws by its fraudulent sale and marketing of Neurontin.
The jury found that Pfizer violated the RICO act.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
919 Reposts · 2.86K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
17/ In 2010, Pfizer admitted that it paid $20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals for consulting and speaking on its behalf during the last six months of 2009.
The disclosure was required due to a settlement agreement for the illegal promotion of drugs.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.08K Reposts · 3.02K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
18/ In 2010, Blue Cross filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, accusing the pharmaceutical giant of illegally bribing 5,000 doctors with lavish Caribbean vacations, golf games, cash payments, massages, and other recreational activities.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
933 Reposts · 2.88K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
19/ In 2012, the SEC charged Pfizer with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for bribing foreign healthcare professionals in Bulgaria, China, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Serbia.
Pfizer settled for $60 million.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
881 Reposts · 2.66K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
20/ In 2012, Pfizer paid $1.2 billion to settle claims by nearly 10,000 women that its drug, Prempro, caused breast cancer.
This included punitive damages for the pharmaceutical giant withholding warnings about the risk of breast cancer.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
883 Reposts · 2.63K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
21/ In 2012, Pfizer paid $55 million to settle criminal charges for illegally promoting its proton pump inhibitor Protonix.
In 2016, Pfizer paid $784 million to settle a medicare fraud case for its promotion of Protonix.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
815 Reposts · 2.53K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
22/ There are over 13,000 proton pump inhibitor lawsuits pending in federal court — which claim that Pfizer and other drug manufacturers — withheld warning signs of kidney disease, acute interstitial nephritis, and kidney failure.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
747 Reposts · 2.46K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
23/ In 2013, Pfizer paid $273 million to settle claims by over 2000 people that its drug, Chantix, caused suicidal thoughts and severe psychological disorders.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
804 Reposts · 2.54K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
24/ : "Virtually every major drug company has either been convicted of fraud or reached a settlement."
"Is fraud the business model of the pharmaceutical industry?"
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
979 Reposts · 3.23K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
25/ Pfizer has habitually engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribed physicians, and suppressed adverse trial results.
This is no secret, yet big government, big tech, and big media banned scientific criticism of Pfizer's covid-19 vaccines.
8:38 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.52K Reposts · 3.71K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
26/ This Pfizer presentation got Dr. Robert Malone () banned from Twitter.
"Pfizer's own 6-month report data on its COVID-19 inoculation shows greater illness and death in the inoculation arm than the placebo arm."
kanekoa.substack.com
The Powerful Pfizer Presentation That Got Dr. Robert Malone Kicked Off Twitter
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.14K Reposts · 3.14K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
27/ tells that he was banned for sharing:
"...a fantastic video... by the Covid Care Alliance group that summarizes all the malfeasance, and data manipulation, and misinterpretation of the Pfizer vaccines, and their clinical trials."
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
931 Reposts · 3K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
28/ Dr. Robert Malone () was banned from Twitter for sharing this 40-minute video presentation created by the , a coalition of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.
Can we discuss it now❓
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
1.39K Reposts · 3.83K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
29/ The video is a fact-based scientific critique of Pfizer's covid-19 vaccine clinical trials.
Considering Pfizer's history of corruption, scientists, doctors, and journalists should not have been banned from social media for asking these questions.
New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
723 Reposts · 2.83K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
30/ The alleged that 84% of the Pfizer report authors had a conflict of interest.
They were either employed, owned stock, or received grants from Pfizer.
For example, the two BioNTech founders, who gained more than $9 billion from the vax, co-authored the report.
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
939 Reposts · 2.72K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
31/ Pfizer unblinded the trial after two months ruining long-term safety data & did not track biomarkers before & after vaccination:
•D-dimer for clotting
•C-reactive protein for inflammation
•Troponins for cardiac damage
•Blood oxygen for hypoxia
•Amyloid for Alzheimer's
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
856 Reposts · 2.6K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
32/ It was left to the discretion of Pfizer's investigators whether or not to test participants for covid-19.
They did not test 3,410 suspected cases (1,594 vaccinated & 1,816 placeboes) who were symptomatic with covid-19.
Why didn't Pfizer remove subjectivity & test everyone?
9:01 PM · Jan 3, 2023
716 Reposts · 2.51K Likes
This is wild. But people will still simp for this company.
11:41 PM · Jan 4, 2023
62 Reposts · 1.16K Likes
kanekoa.substack.com @KanekoaTheGreat
Absolutely. They are white collar criminals who prioritize profits over human lives. The report that got banned from Twitter is mind blowing. No one talks about the increase in illness and death in the vaccinated arm of the trial.
11:57 PM · Jan 4, 2023
124 Reposts · 711 Likes
Model Y - End of the ICE age @ModelYendofICE
You should look into the CEO and how he worked on the failed horse vaccine
Model Y - End of the ICE age @ModelYendofICE
@Alex_Kump @Goldfiinger77 @LimitingThe on everything of interest 😀
Anyways: here is the person you trust so much
Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer Animal Health Area President for Zoetis that time
veterinarian Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla #COVID19 responsible for approving vaccine at that time https://t.co/EkALBcQEpB
1:52 PM · Jan 5, 2023
4 Reposts · 10 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
1/ During the last 3 years, has banned many scientists, doctors, journalists, and activists. This 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 tells the stories of many censorship victims.
Please RT so gets aware of the sad fact that many of us are still banned and waiting to get reinstated.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
5.57K Reposts · 7.55K Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
2/ 𝗗𝗿 𝗠𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗲 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 () is an American Intensivist (ICU doc), NYC ICU volunteer and saw 2000 covid patients in ICU-banned from Twitter for 4 months for calling out the AMA for failure to have CPT codes for C19 Vaccine Injury.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
358 Reposts · 1.06K Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
3/ 𝗡𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗛𝘂𝗱𝘀𝗼𝗻 () is a South African actuary who is still banned for quoting a public health figure stating that masks make the wearer a vested participant in the lie they've been told and for arguing that Pfizer Phase III trials were fraudulently designed.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
375 Reposts · 1.08K Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
4/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗟𝗼𝘂𝗽𝗶𝘀 () is a Danish/Greek MD who was banned for 3 months for discussing European excess mortality. She has been through two medical boards for questioning the Covid policy from the beginning.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
351 Reposts · 977 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
5/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗡𝗮𝗼𝗺𝗶 𝗪𝗼𝗹𝗳 () is a fierce freedom fighter, exposer of the Pfizer documents, and CEO of . She was banned on 6/5/21 for correctly expressing concern over the effects of the mRNA jabs on menstrual cycles.
theguardian.com
Naomi Wolf banned from Twitter for spreading vaccine myths
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
370 Reposts · 1.16K Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
6/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗦𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗸 (; that's me) is a biotechnologist who was banned for 18 months for praising VitD, questioning the efficacy of masks & stating that viruses usually become weaker over time. He lost his job at the university for speaking out on .
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
296 Reposts · 994 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
7/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲 () is a doctor & pioneer of mRNA technology. He was banned for 1 year without any warning for posting a link to the Canadian Covid Care Alliance vid questioning the safety & effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccines.
metro.co.uk
Prominent vaccine scientist banned from Twitter for spreading anti-vaxx content
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
326 Reposts · 963 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
8/ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗙𝗼𝘅 (), a now popular Substacker and citizen journalist, was banned for nine months for cutting and sharing viral clips of top doctors, scientists, and dissenting voices speaking out against the mainstream Covid-19 narrative.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
270 Reposts · 895 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
9/ 𝗧𝗲𝘅𝗮𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘀𝗮𝘆 () is an American living in Dallas, Texas. She was permanently de-platformed for nearly 5 months for sharing a news clip of Tucker Carlson in which he read from The Lancet and Twitter wrongly labelled it as Covid misinformation.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
237 Reposts · 812 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
10/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗞𝗮𝘁 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘆 () is a Croatian-born, American-trained board-certified family physician and president of two medical associations who was suspended from Twitter and censored for sharing Paul Alexander's substack on Monkey Pox.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
198 Reposts · 692 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
11/ 𝗘𝗺𝗺𝗮 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗱𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 () is the eponym of Dr Jessica Hockett, who now works in education policy following a 20-year career with K12 schools & organizations. She was banned for 6.5 months after directly quoting a WSJ article on toddler vaccine development.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
202 Reposts · 687 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
12/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗕𝗼𝘄𝗱𝗲𝗻 () is an Otolaryngologist and Sleep Medicine specialist in Houston TX who was banned from Twitter for 5 months after exposing collusion between the CDC and Twitter with a viral tweet with over 1M views.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
210 Reposts · 717 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
13/ Dr. Bowden was also suspended from Houston Methodist hospital for saying “ivermectin works” and “vaccine mandates are wrong” on Twitter, the hospital claiming she was spreading dangerous misinformation.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
176 Reposts · 704 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
14/ 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘇 () is an American journalist who was reporting on COVID and election integrity at the time she was banned for 23 months with no specific offending tweet identified.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
182 Reposts · 634 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
15/ She was first told it was for “platform manipulation and spam” and upon appeal that she violated the “Coordinated Harmful Activity Policy.” Because of her suspension, her business was adversely affected, and people were unable to obtain life-saving information about Covid-19.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
147 Reposts · 576 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
16/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗟𝘆𝗻𝗻 𝗙𝘆𝗻𝗻 () is an American MD who was banned for 18 months for no reason, perhaps evading a ban for an account already reinstated. The original ban was for stating that the SC2 spike protein is itself pathogenic & masks don't mitigate viral spread.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
179 Reposts · 612 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
17/ 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗶 () is a UK-based architect & filmmaker who was banned for 20 months after questioning the zoonotic origin theory of SARSCoV2 & whether Covid19 injections are being miscategorized as vaccines. No official reason was ever given for his ban
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
175 Reposts · 628 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
18/ 𝗞𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗸𝗼𝗮 () is an American independent journalist who was banned for 23 months for reporting on the 'most secure election in American history.' Twitter broke its own 5-strike policy and permanently suspended his account on his 2nd strike.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
175 Reposts · 650 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
19/ This inspired him to garner the support of half a million subscribers on Substack, Telegram, and alternative social media platforms where he continues his quest to become a 'misinformation superspreader.'
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
113 Reposts · 566 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
20/ 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗳 𝗡𝗲𝗿𝗱 () is an engineer & journalist who was banned for sharing adverse event data related to the COVID-19 “vaccines” after his father was vaccine injured. He lost his career in the Pharma Industry for not complying with the vaxx mandates.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
172 Reposts · 629 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
21/ 𝗘𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗮𝗹𝗼 () is a cat who was banned for 24 months without warning for reasons that were never disclosed but likely owed to his opposition to covid lockdowns and mask mandates.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
116 Reposts · 556 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
22/ 𝗝𝗼𝗲𝗹 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘆 () is a data scientist who was banned for 14 months for sharing information from experts about the risks of COVID "vaccination" for pregnant women and the potential for vaccine-acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
147 Reposts · 572 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
23/ 𝗘𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗱 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗻 () is the WH Correspondent for Newsmax TV. Before, she served as the chief WH Correspondent for OAN. As part of her WH coverage, Robinson has travelled with the president reporting live during the Helsinki and Singapore Summits.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
140 Reposts · 570 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
24/ 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗹 𝗣 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 () is an American attorney who was banned for 10 months for opining that, though they may not be willing to face it, the vast majority have realized that every COVID policy has been one giant fraud.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
164 Reposts · 621 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
25/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗴 () is a German physician and transplant immunologist who was banned for 14 months now for pointing out the fact, that "social distancing" and "mask mandates" against COVID lack scientific proof of efficacy.
9:06 PM · Jan 6, 2023
180 Reposts · 605 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
26/ He was eventually banned for stating "No, there is NO medical reason for people without symptoms of illness to limit their social contact with each other." His current handle is .
9:07 PM · Jan 6, 2023
108 Reposts · 516 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
27/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗧𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘀 𝗕𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 () is a Swiss internist and cardiologist with thesis in immunology and virology who was banned for 22 months for sharing Doctors for COVID Ethics first open letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
9:07 PM · Jan 6, 2023
259 Reposts · 765 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
28/ He was forcibly detained psychiatrically for six days for doing nothing else than his duty as a doctor ("First do no harm!") and speaking out on . He's still banned. His current account is .
9:08 PM · Jan 6, 2023
229 Reposts · 710 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
29/ 𝗠. 𝗧𝗼𝗱𝗱 𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗻𝘆 MD FAAC () is an American Internist who was banned for 6 months for "ban evasion" even though he never had another account.
9:08 PM · Jan 6, 2023
108 Reposts · 466 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
30/ 𝗔𝗯𝗶𝗿 𝗕𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗻 (), Masters in Public Health, was banned twice ‘permanently’ from Twitter. Her last ban lasted 10 months for sharing a video by Dr Peter McCullough stating the conditions for assuming vaccine causality of adverse events.
9:09 PM · Jan 6, 2023
132 Reposts · 519 Likes
Dr. Simon Goddek @goddeketal
31/ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗣𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵, MD, MPH () is an American Cardiologist, Internist and Epidemiologist who was banned for 2 months for sharing a video clip about children and the risk of myocarditis.
9:10 PM · Jan 6, 2023
210 Reposts · 700 Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
Many think social media companies only censored "vaccine misinformation." But a recently-released email shows Facebook reassuring the White House that they were censoring "often-true content” that "does not contain actionable misinformation" but was "discouraging vaccines."
11:21 PM · Jan 11, 2023
11K Reposts · 38.7K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
What's more, said the Facebook executive, "We'll remove these Groups, Pages, and Accounts when they are disproportionately promoting this sensationalized content. More on this front as we proceed to implement."
11:31 PM · Jan 11, 2023
305 Reposts · 1.59K Likes
Michael Shellenberger @ShellenbergerMD
There is a pattern here of the Biden White House intimidating Twitter and Facebook execs into censoring "legitimate findings and questions about our Covid policies"
12:10 AM · Jan 12, 2023
476 Reposts · 2K Likes
1.THREAD: Twitter Files #14
THE RUSSIAGATE LIES
One: The Fake Tale of Russian Bots and the Hashtag
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
27.3K Reposts · 66.8K Likes
a crucial moment in a years-long furor, Democrats denounced a report about flaws in the Trump-Russia investigation, saying it was boosted by Russian “bots” and “trolls.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.68K Reposts · 15K Likes
3.Twitter officials were aghast, finding no evidence of Russian influence:
“We are feeding congressional trolls.”
“Not any…significant activity connected to Russia.”
“Putting the cart before the horse assuming this is propaganda/bots.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
4.1K Reposts · 17.3K Likes
4.Twitter warned politicians and media the not only lacked evidence, but had evidence the accounts weren’t Russian – and were roundly ignored.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
3.43K Reposts · 16.8K Likes
5.On January 18th, 2018, Republican Devin Nunes submitted a classified memo to the House Intel Committee detailing abuses by the FBI in obtaining FISA surveillance authority against Trump-connected figures, including the crucial role played by the infamous “Steele Dossier”:
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
3.58K Reposts · 15.8K Likes
6.The Nunes assertions would virtually all be verified in a report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz in December 2019.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
3.33K Reposts · 15.2K Likes
7.Nonetheless, national media in January and early February of 2018 denounced the Nunes report in oddly identical language, calling it a “joke”:
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
3.41K Reposts · 15.3K Likes
It seems there is no number 8. Here’s number 9…
9.On January 23rd, 2018, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA) published an open letter saying the hashtag “gained the immediate attention and assistance of social media accounts linked to Russian influence operations.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.86K Reposts · 13.5K Likes
9b. Feinstein/Schiff said the Nunes memo "distorts" classified information, but note they didn't call it incorrect.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.53K Reposts · 13.2K Likes
10.Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal followed suit, publishing a letter saying, “We find it reprehensible that Russian agents have so eagerly manipulated innocent Americans.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.44K Reposts · 12.7K Likes
11.Feinstein, Schiff, Blumenthal, and media members all pointed to the same source: the Hamilton 68 dashboard created by former FBI counterintelligence official Clint Watts, under the auspices of the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD).
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.94K Reposts · 13.2K Likes
12.The dashboard, which featured a crude picture of Vladimir Putin deviously blowing evil red Twitter birds into the atmosphere, was vague in how it reached its conclusions.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2K Reposts · 11.7K Likes
13.Inside Twitter, executives panned Watts, Hamilton 68, and the Alliance for Securing Democracy. Two key complaints: Hamilton 68 seemed to be everyone’s only source, and no one was checking with Twitter.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.16K Reposts · 12.1K Likes
14.“I encourage you to be skeptical of Hamilton 68’s take on this, which as far as I can tell is the only source for these stories,” said Global Policy Communications Chief (and future WH and NSC spokesperson) Emily Horne.
She added: “It’s a comms play for ASD.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.12K Reposts · 11.6K Likes
15.“All the swirl is based on Hamilton,” said Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.93K Reposts · 11.1K Likes
16.“If ASD isn’t going to fact-check with us, we should feel free to correct the record on their work,” said Policy VP Carlos Monje.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.73K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
17.Roth couldn’t find any Russian connection to – at all. “I just reviewed the accounts that posted the first 50 tweets with and… none of them show any signs of affiliation to Russia.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.44K Reposts · 11.7K Likes
18.“We investigated, found that engagement as overwhelmingly organic, and driven by VITs” – Very Important Tweeters, including Wikileaks and congressman Steve King.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.06K Reposts · 11K Likes
19.A staffer for “DiFi” – Feinstein – agreed it would be “helpful to know” how Hamilton 68 goes by “the process by which they decide an account is Russian.”
But, only AFTER Feinstein published her letter about Russian influence.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.94K Reposts · 10.6K Likes
20.When Twitter spoke to a Blumenthal staffer, they tried to “wave him off” because “we don’t believe these are bots.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.84K Reposts · 10.5K Likes
21.Added another: “It might be worth nudging Blumenthal’s staffer that it could be in his boss’ best interest not to go out there because it could come back to make him look silly.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.91K Reposts · 10.5K Likes
Twitter exec even tried to negotiate, implying an undisclosed future PR concession if Blumenthal would lay off on this:
“It seems like there are other wins we could offer him.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.94K Reposts · 10.2K Likes
23.Blumenthal published his letter anyway.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.73K Reposts · 10.2K Likes
24.Execs eventually grew frustrated over what they saw as a circular process – presented with claims of Russian activity, even when denied, led to more claims.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.92K Reposts · 10.7K Likes
25.They expressed this explicitly to Blumenthal’s camp, saying “Twitter spent a lot of resources” on this request and the reward from Blumenthal shouldn’t be round after round of requests.”
“We can’t do a user notice each time this happens.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.79K Reposts · 10.2K Likes
26.Eventually Twitter staff realize “Blumenthal isn’t looking for real and nuanced solutions” but “just wants to get credit for pushing us further.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.01K Reposts · 10.6K Likes
27.Ultimately senior executives talked about “feeding congressional trolls” and compared their situation to the children’s book, “If You Give a Mouse a Cookie.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.98K Reposts · 10.6K Likes
the story, if you give a mouse a cookie, he’ll want a glass of milk, which will lead to a wave of other exhausting requests, at the end of which he’ll want a glass of milk. And one more cookie.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.77K Reposts · 10.6K Likes
29.The metaphor for the endless Russia requests was so perfect, one exec wrote, “I’m legit embarrassed I didn’t think of that first.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.85K Reposts · 10.6K Likes
30.Despite universal internal conviction that there were no Russians in the story, Twitter went on to follow a slavish pattern of not challenging Russia claims on the record.
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
2.32K Reposts · 11.3K Likes
31.Outside counsel from DC-connected firms like Debevoise and Plimpton advised Twitter to use language like, “With respect to particular hashtags, we take seriously any activity that may represent an abuse of our platform.”
5:29 PM · Jan 12, 2023
1.87K Reposts · 10.5K Likes
1.TWITTER FILES: Supplemental
More Adam Schiff Ban Requests,
and "Deamplification"
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
8.22K Reposts · 21.8K Likes
2.Staff of House Democrat wrote to Twitter quite often, asking that tweets be taken down. This important use of taxpayer resources involved an ask about a “Peter Douche” parody photo of Joe Biden. The DNC made the same request: https://t.co/fM2Y2jxVKw
Nate's Liver - Commentary @SilERabbit
Sloppy Joe is trending. I wonder if it's because of this. You can tell it's a deep fake because Jill Biden isn't covering for him. https://t.co/LMzx7fpMaP
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
1.73K Reposts · 6.16K Likes
3.The real issue was Donald Trump retweeted the Biden pic. To its credit Twitter refused to remove it, with Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth saying it had obvious “humorous intent” and “any reasonable observer” - apparently, not a Schiff staffer - could see it was doctored.
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
949 Reposts · 4.97K Likes
4.Schiff staffer Jeff Lowenstein didn’t give up, claiming there was a “slippery slope concern here.”
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
879 Reposts · 4.39K Likes
5.Twitter also refused requests for bans of content about Schiff and his staff, e.g. “complete suppress[ion of] any and all search results about Mr. Misko and other Committee staffers.” Twitter said this would not be “conceivable.”
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
844 Reposts · 4.24K Likes
6.Even when Twitter didn’t suspend an account, that didn’t mean they didn’t act. Schiff’s office repeatedly complained about “QAnon related activity” that were often tweets about other matters, like the identity of the Ukraine “whistleblower” or the Steele dossier:
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
1.05K Reposts · 4.66K Likes
7.Twitter policy at the time didn’t ban QAnon, but “deamplified” such accounts. About the batch of tweets that included those above, Twitter execs wrote: “We can internally confirm that a number of the accounts flagged are already included in this deamplification.”
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
873 Reposts · 4.26K Likes
8.Schiff’s office had a concern about “deamplification,” though: it might make it harder for law enforcement to track the offending Tweeters.
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
799 Reposts · 4.16K Likes
9.“WE APPRECIATE GREATLY”
“We are curious whether any deamplification measures implemented by Twitter’s enforcement team – which we appreciate greatly – could… impede the ability of law enforcement to search Twitter for potential threats about Misko and other HPSCI staff.”
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
932 Reposts · 4.51K Likes
10.For more, watch , , , , , and others.
Twitter had no editorial input. Searches were carried out by third parties, so the documents could be limited.
4:12 PM · Jan 13, 2023
712 Reposts · 3.99K Likes
A consistent theme of the has been concrete evidence that Russiagate headlines were manufactured by politicians and media — the thread below blows up the absurd panic stoked by , , and , among others.
1.THREAD: Twitter Files #14
THE RUSSIAGATE LIES
One: The Fake Tale of Russian Bots and the #ReleaseTheMemo Hashtag
6:18 PM · Jan 12, 2023
4.41K Reposts · 12.5K Likes
It’s odd to watch media figures who blew the Trump-Russia story in the most humorous ways act like they didn’t. Here are clips of you scoffing in the wake of Nunes memo at anyone foolish enough to mistrust “the FBI, the FBI!”:
It's weird to watch the sprawling Russian interference operation in 2016, which involved multiple GRU units engaging in criminal sabotage with the aim of electing Donald Trump and allowing full Russian annexation of Crimea and the Donbas, get retconned into a story about bots.
9:47 PM · Jan 13, 2023
531 Reposts · 1.83K Likes
Congressman, I’m an American citizen, I love my country, and accusing me of repeating “Kremlin talking points” when I report something you find inconvenient is beyond reprehensible. You and your sleazy red-baiting pals in congress should be ashamed.
What @mtaibbi leaves out is that the article he cites explains DOJ dropped the two cases because discovery would give the Russians information they could weaponize. @mtaibbi now wants you to doubt the DOJ’s case against 12 Russian agents. He’s spewing Kremlin talking points. https://t.co/DZmbqqR8sH
8:34 PM · Jan 13, 2023
5.5K Reposts · 25.3K Likes
Also my story wasn’t about 2016 or the GRU. It was about the grossly dishonest campaign by your congressional colleagues to depict the hashtag as driven by Russian influence. Care to address the actual story?
You can believe gaslighting by @mtaibbi, or you can believe facts. Russian meddling was not manufactured. DOJ indicted 12 Russian Intel officers for hacking: “defendants claimed to be American hacktivists and used…Twitter accounts to promote the website.” https://t.co/i0FsAkaddX https://t.co/NEmioQkMf8
7:55 PM · Jan 13, 2023
1.27K Reposts · 6.47K Likes
What leaves out is that the DOJ indicted 12 individuals they knew would never show up in court, but had to drop two related cases of companies that did fight back, rather than go through discovery:
You can believe gaslighting by @mtaibbi, or you can believe facts. Russian meddling was not manufactured. DOJ indicted 12 Russian Intel officers for hacking: “defendants claimed to be American hacktivists and used…Twitter accounts to promote the website.” https://t.co/i0FsAkaddX https://t.co/NEmioQkMf8
7:53 PM · Jan 13, 2023
1.53K Reposts · 6.42K Likes
The office of said they "appreciate greatly" Twitter's efforts to deamplify certain accounts, but worried such shadow bans might "impede the ability of law enforcement" to search for certain accounts:
9.“WE APPRECIATE GREATLY”
“We are curious whether any deamplification measures implemented by Twitter’s enforcement team – which we appreciate greatly – could… impede the ability of law enforcement to search Twitter for potential threats about Misko and other HPSCI staff.” https://t.co/h7TRauK6j5
5:54 PM · Jan 13, 2023
786 Reposts · 2.47K Likes
The office of often asked Twitter to take down tweets on the grounds that they were "QAnon related" activity, but see below - they were often just run-of-the-mill political criticism:
6.Even when Twitter didn’t suspend an account, that didn’t mean they didn’t act. Schiff’s office repeatedly complained about “QAnon related activity” that were often tweets about other matters, like the identity of the Ukraine “whistleblower” or the Steele dossier: https://t.co/XKzY8AmB5R
5:52 PM · Jan 13, 2023
1.29K Reposts · 4.09K Likes
Congressman, I’m an American citizen, I love my country, and accusing me of repeating “Kremlin talking points” when I report something you find inconvenient is beyond reprehensible. You and your sleazy red-baiting pals in congress should be ashamed.
What @mtaibbi leaves out is that the article he cites explains DOJ dropped the two cases because discovery would give the Russians information they could weaponize. @mtaibbi now wants you to doubt the DOJ’s case against 12 Russian agents. He’s spewing Kremlin talking points. https://t.co/DZmbqqR8sH
8:34 PM · Jan 13, 2023
7.97K Reposts · 36.3K Likes
It’s odd to watch media figures who blew the Trump-Russia story in the most humorous ways act like they didn’t. Here are clips of you scoffing in the wake of Nunes memo at anyone foolish enough to mistrust “the FBI, the FBI!”:
It's weird to watch the sprawling Russian interference operation in 2016, which involved multiple GRU units engaging in criminal sabotage with the aim of electing Donald Trump and allowing full Russian annexation of Crimea and the Donbas, get retconned into a story about bots.
9:47 PM · Jan 13, 2023
946 Reposts · 3.86K Likes
Updated Capsule Summaries of all Twitter Files Threads to Date, With Links and a Glossary
open.substack.com
Capsule Summaries of all Twitter Files Threads to Date, With Links and a Glossary
1:39 PM · Jan 15, 2023
608 Reposts · 1.45K Likes
1.THREAD: Twitter Files #15
MOVE OVER, JAYSON BLAIR: TWITTER FILES EXPOSE NEXT GREAT MEDIA FRAUD
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
23.6K Reposts · 53K Likes
2.“I think we need to just call this out on the bullshit it is.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.33K Reposts · 13.7K Likes
3.“Falsely accuses a bunch of legitimate right-leaning accounts of being Russian bots.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
3.09K Reposts · 14.7K Likes
4.“Virtually any conclusion drawn from it will take conversations in conservative circles on Twitter and accuse them of being Russian.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.59K Reposts · 13.1K Likes
5.These are quotes by Twitter executives about Hamilton 68, a digital “dashboard” that claimed to track Russian influence and was the source of hundreds if not thousands of mainstream print and TV news stories in the Trump years.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.65K Reposts · 12.8K Likes
6.The “dashboard” was headed by former FBI counterintelligence official (and current MSNBC contributor) Clint Watts, and funded by a neoliberal think tank, the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD).
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
4.13K Reposts · 16.3K Likes
7.The ASD advisory council includes neoconservative writer Bill Kristol, former Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, ex-Hillary for America chief John Podesta, and former heads or deputy heads of the CIA, NSA, and the Department of Homeland Security.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
3.65K Reposts · 13.2K Likes
outlets for years cited Watts and Hamilton 68 when claiming Russian bots were “amplifying” an endless parade of social media causes – against strikes in Syria, in support of Fox host Laura Ingraham, the campaigns of both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.41K Reposts · 11.4K Likes
9.Hamilton 68 was the source for stories claiming Russian bots pushed terms like “deep state” or hashtags like , , , , , and , among many others.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.98K Reposts · 12.9K Likes
10. The secret ingredient to Hamilton 68’s analytical method? A list: “Our analysis has linked 600 Twitter accounts to Russian influence activities online,” was how the site put it at launch.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.05K Reposts · 10.4K Likes
11. Hamilton 68 never released the list, claiming "the Russians will simply shut [the accounts] down." All those reporters and TV personalities making claims about “Russian bots” never really knew what they were describing.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.27K Reposts · 11.2K Likes
12. Twitter executives were in a unique position to recreate Hamilton’s list, reverse-engineering it from the site’s requests for Twitter data.
Concerned about the deluge of Hamilton-based news stories, they did so – and what they found shocked them.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.39K Reposts · 11.1K Likes
13.“These accounts,” they concluded, “are neither strongly Russian nor strongly bots.”
“No evidence to support the statement that the dashboard is a finger on the pulse of Russian information ops.”
“Hardly illuminating a massive influence operation.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.57K Reposts · 11.6K Likes
14. In layman’s terms, the Hamilton 68 barely had any Russians. In fact, apart from a few RT accounts, it’s mostly full of ordinary Americans, Canadians, and British.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.74K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
was a scam. Instead of tracking how “Russia” influenced American attitudes, Hamilton 68 simply collected a handful of mostly real, mostly American accounts, and described their organic conversations as Russian scheming.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
3.63K Reposts · 14.1K Likes
16. Twitter immediately recognized these Hamilton-driven news stories posed a major ethical problem, potentially implicating them.
“Real people need to know they’ve been unilaterally labeled Russian stooges without evidence or recourse,” Roth wrote.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.59K Reposts · 11.7K Likes
17.Some Twitter execs badly wanted to out Hamilton 68. After Russians were blamed for hyping the hashtag, one wrote:
“Why can’t we say we’ve investigated… and citing Hamilton 68 is being wrong, irresponsible, and biased?”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.12K Reposts · 10.7K Likes
18.Yoel Roth wanted a confrontation. “My recommendation at this stage is an ultimatum: you release the list or we do,” he wrote.
However, there were internal concerns about taking on the politically connected Alliance for Securing Democracy.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.14K Reposts · 10.4K Likes
19.“We have to be careful in how much we push back on ASD publicly,” said future White House and NSC spokesperson Emily Horne.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.99K Reposts · 9.82K Likes
20.“I also have been very frustrated in not calling out Hamilton 68 more publicly, but understand we have to play a longer game here,” wrote Carlos Monje, the future senior advisor to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.08K Reposts · 9.93K Likes
21. So the “legitimate people,” as one Twitter exec called them, never found out they’d been used as fodder for mountains of news stories about “Russian influence.” Because the contain the list, they’ve begun finding out.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.06K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
22.“I’m shocked,” says Sonia Monsour, who as a child lived through civil war in Lebanon. “Supposedly in a free world, we are being watched at many levels, by what we say online.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.93K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
23. “I’ve written a book about the U.S. Constitution,” says Chicago-based lawyer Dave Shestokas. “How I made a list like this is incredible to me.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.95K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
24. “When I was growing up, my father told me about the McCarthyite blacklist,” says Oregon native Jacob Levich. “As a child it would never have occurred to me that this would come back, in force and broadly, in a way… designed to undermine rights we hold dear.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.17K Reposts · 10.9K Likes
25. Even Twitter execs were stunned to read who was on the list. Wrote policy chief Nick Pickles about British comic : “A wind-up merchant… I follow him and wouldn’t say he’s pro-Russian… I can’t even remember him tweeting about Russia.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.86K Reposts · 9.91K Likes
26. I’m listed as a foreign bot?” said conservative media figure Dennis Michael Lynch. “As a proud taxpaying citizen, charitable family man, and honest son of a U.S. Marine, I deserve better. We all do!”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.78K Reposts · 9.29K Likes
27. Consortium editor Joe Lauria too was angered to find he was on the list, which targeted voices across the spectrum: “Organizations like Hamilton 68 are in business to enforce an official narrative, which means excising inconvenient facts, which they call ‘misinformation.’”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.91K Reposts · 9.23K Likes
28.What makes this an important story is the sheer scale of the news footprint left by Hamilton 68’s digital McCarthyism. The quantity of headlines and TV segments dwarfs the impact of individual fabulists like Jayson Blair or Stephen Glass.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
3.02K Reposts · 10.8K Likes
29.Hamilton 68 was used as a source to assert Russian influence in an astonishing array of news stories: support for Brett Kavanaugh or the Devin Nunes memo, the Parkland shooting, manipulation of black voters, “attacks” on the Mueller investigation…
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.14K Reposts · 9.21K Likes
30.These stories raised fears in the population, and most insidious of all, were used to smear people like Tulsi Gabbard as foreign “assets,” and drum up sympathy for political causes like Joe Biden’s campaign by describing critics as Russian-aligned.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.6K Reposts · 10.3K Likes
31.Incredibly, and ironically, these stories were also frequently used as evidence of the spread of “fake news” on sites like Twitter:
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.14K Reposts · 9.99K Likes
was a lie. The illusion of Russian support was created by tracking people like Joe Lauria, Sonia Monsour, and Dave Shestokas. Virtually every major American news organization cited these fake tales— even fact-checking sites like Snopes and Politifact.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
2.98K Reposts · 12.6K Likes
33.Twitter didn’t have the guts to out Hamilton 68 publicly but did try to speak to reporters off the record. “Reporters are chafing,” said Horne. “It’s like shouting into a void.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.24K Reposts · 5.66K Likes
34.Roth was offended by the idea that tweets on certain themes suggested subversion. “Can we talk about how incredibly condescending…? If you talk about these themes, you must have been duped by Russian propaganda.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.05K Reposts · 5.45K Likes
35.Again, even Roth, like most Twitter execs an ardent Democratic partisan, saw that the Hamilton scheme would lead people “to assert that any right-leaning content is propagated by Russian bots.”
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.26K Reposts · 5.84K Likes
least two other research institutions that used similar methodologies – and were cited as sources in news stories – were also criticized in Twitter email correspondence.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
877 Reposts · 4.86K Likes
37.MSNBC, Watts, the Washington Post, Politico, Mother Jones (which did at least 14 Hamilton 68 stories), the Alliance for Securing Democracy, and the offices of politicians like Dianne Feinstein all refused comment, unless this counts:
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.47K Reposts · 5.91K Likes
38.This was an academic scandal as well, as Harvard, Princeton, Temple, NYU, GWU, and other universities promoted Hamilton 68 as a source:
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.85K Reposts · 6.65K Likes
39.Perhaps most embarrassingly, elected officials promoted the site, and invited Hamilton “experts” to testify. Dianne Feinstein, James Lankford, Richard Blumenthal, Adam Schiff, and Mark Warner were among the offenders.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.9K Reposts · 6.62K Likes
40.The mix of digital McCarthyism and fraud did great damage to American politics and culture. News outlets that don't disavow these stories, or still pay Hamilton vets as analysts, shouldn't be trusted. Every subscriber to those outlets to write to editors about the issue.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
1.88K Reposts · 7.25K Likes
41.For more from the , follow , , , , and others. Twitter had no input into this story. Searches were conducted by a third party, so material may have been left out.
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
884 Reposts · 4.99K Likes
42. For more on this story, read the detailed new story at
5:49 PM · Jan 27, 2023
890 Reposts · 4.7K Likes
And a special thanks to for putting together video for this segment - much more to come.
5:53 PM · Jan 27, 2023
727 Reposts · 5.41K Likes
WTF? “The consensus among younger journalists is that we got it all wrong,” Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, editor in chief of the San Francisco Chronicle, told us. “Objectivity has got to go.”
washingtonpost.com
Opinion | Newsrooms that move beyond ‘objectivity’ can build trust
7:42 PM · Jan 31, 2023
2.15K Reposts · 8.93K Likes
NEW SUBSTACK POST:
House Oversight Hearing On Twitter’s Election Interference Validates Loomer Lawsuit
Please SUBSCRIBE and SHARE. Thank you!
lauraloomer.substack.com
House Oversight Hearing on Twitter’s Election Interference Validates Loomer RICO Lawsuit
11:19 PM · Feb 11, 2023
145 Reposts · 436 Likes
TWITTER FILES #16
Comic Interlude: A Media Experiment
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
6.7K Reposts · 17K Likes
2. The have revealed a lot: thousands of moderation requests from every corner of government, Feds mistaking both conservatives and leftists for fictional Russians, even Twitter deciding on paper to cede moderation authority to the “U.S. intelligence community”:
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.53K Reposts · 6.55K Likes
3. These and at least a dozen other newsworthy revelations produced exactly zilch in mainstream news coverage in the last two months:
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
959 Reposts · 6.17K Likes
4. Then House hearings were held last week, at which one witness told a story about Donald Trump asking to remove a mean tweet by Chrissy Teigen.
The press went bananas. Now THAT was big news!
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.01K Reposts · 6.58K Likes
5. Purely to show the bankruptcy of media in this area, let’s introduce a pair of loud new data points, and see if any press figures at all cover either of them.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
819 Reposts · 6.01K Likes
6. If a president freaking out about one tweeter is news, surely a U.S. Senator finking on three hundred-plus of his constituents also must be?
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.35K Reposts · 6.91K Likes
7. Here’s Maine Senator Angus King writing to Twitter to call a slew of accounts “suspicious” for reasons like:
“Rand Paul visit excitement”
“Bot (averages 20 tweets a day)”
Being followed by rival Eric Brakey
Or, my personal favorite: “Mentions immigration.”
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.41K Reposts · 6.84K Likes
8. King’s office declined comment. If Dick Nixon sniffed glue, this is what his enemies list might have looked like:
docs.google.com
Suspected Accounts.xlsx - Google Drive
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
851 Reposts · 5.53K Likes
9. So as not to focus only on Dems or those who caucus with Democrats, here’s a contribution from Republican Mark Lenzi, a State Department official most famous for offering to donate his brain to science after a claimed brush with Havana syndrome.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
653 Reposts · 4.52K Likes
10. Lenzi wrote to Twitter bluntly asking to remove 14 accounts distinguished among other things by skepticism of Russiagate: “The below are some Russian controlled accounts that I think you will want to look into and delete.”
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
957 Reposts · 5.19K Likes
11.A government official, writing from a State department email, asks to “delete” 14 accounts that are engaged in legit speech and for which no evidence is shown they're Russian controlled or bots (in fact, we at Racket know some of these people). A clear First Amendment issue.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.31K Reposts · 6.91K Likes
12. I noted before there were many crazy requests in Twitter records from officials wanting foes taken off Twitter, with Californian Adam Schiff’s effort to ban a reporter and stop “any and all search results” about a staffer making Angus King’s spreadsheet gambit look tame.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.34K Reposts · 6.21K Likes
13. The fact that mainstream outlets ignored the Schiff story but howled about Teigen shows what they're about. Responses like this are designed to keep blue-leaning audiences especially focused on moronic partisan spats, obscuring bigger picture narratives.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.6K Reposts · 8.33K Likes
14. The real story emerging in the is about a ballooning federal censorship bureaucracy that's not aimed at either the left or the right per se, but at the whole population of outsiders, who are being systematically defined as threats.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.62K Reposts · 7.19K Likes
15. Beginning in March, we'll start using the Twitter Files to tell this larger story about how Americans turned their counterterrorism machinery against themselves, to disastrous effect, through little-known federal agencies like the Global Engagement Center (GEC).
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
1.4K Reposts · 6.91K Likes
16. Until then, if you found yourself on King's list, please DM or write in to . I'm on vacation next week, but we'll mock up "Angus King Told Twitter I Was Suspicious, And All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt" shirts when I get back.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
678 Reposts · 5.15K Likes
17. Thanks to contributors like and , and thanks also to Racket researchers. Searches were performed by a third party and material may have been left out.
12:13 AM · Feb 19, 2023
613 Reposts · 5.13K Likes
That is all for the time being. I will update this when more is released. Please subscribe and share! Thanks.