"Severe Disablement" from Vaccination
A Sign of Things to Come?
The United Kingdom has a Vaccine Damage Scheme Team. Where the law allows for it, people are apparently increasingly seeking damages for “a severe disablement due to direct affects from a qualifying vaccination.”1 The UK’s NHS (National Health Service) has a job offering2 for people to help them with the rising demand to process these cases…
An opportunity has arisen for multiple Caseworker posts within the Vaccine Damage Payment Team, part of our Primary Care Services Directorate.
The Vaccine Damage Scheme Team works on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Care to process claims for a one-off payment to people who have suffered a severe disablement due to direct affects from a qualifying vaccination.
They also state that…
there is an expectation of handling sensitive and emotional beneficiary enquiries received through a variety of media methods.
In other words, people are going to be a wee bit upset that they were more-or-less lied to, terrorized and forced to take experimental drugs that were approved without due process (it should have taken 5 to 10 years of research or more in real time3), about which the FDA is trying to hide information after “ensuring full transparency”, that could only really be called vaccines after the definition of vaccine was changed4 to meet these experimental drugs rather than to make these experimental drugs meet the requirements for vaccines and that they now suffer “a severe disablement due to direct affects from”5 these experimental drugs.
What ever happened to “Just say NO”?
Thanks for reading!
∴ Liberty my right ∴ Truth my sword ∴
∴ Laughter my shield ∴ Knowledge my steed ∴
∴ Love my solace ∴ Honor my reward ∴
According to, for example, a vaccine research and development timeline from John Hopkins University (archived here), it should take a minimum of 5 years but could take over 10 years. It seems corporate propaganda (the “news”) is programming people to repeat the claim that the testing for these drugs was accelerated and that they were properly tested before being approved. This seems to be dangerous misinformation. According to JHU, phases I, II, and III can be accelerated to a bare minimum of 11 months time but this does not include the preclinical trials which should take 4 years and one month at the bare minimum. Was it 5 years or more before they released the drugs? No. It was not.
Also see the following by Aaron Siri; “Scientists Sue the FDA for Data it Relied Upon to License Pfizer's Covid-19 Vaccine” oct 11, 2021 (archive), “FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data” Nov 17, 2021 (archive), and “FDA Doubles Down: Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until at Least the Year 2096 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data” Dec 7, 2021 (archive).
The CDC changed their definition of vaccine from “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, who USA Today says “has become the source of online misinformation about vaccines” changed their definition of vaccine from this to this. It used to say that a vaccine will “produce” or “artificially increase” immunity to infection/disease and now they say that it will “stimulate” an “immune response” to infection/disease.
In other words, they changed the definition from something that is effective to something that may not be effective at all. Furthermore, they are just mislabeling a treatment as a vaccine. If you need to take a drug over and over again, it is not a vaccine. It is a treatment.